Literature DB >> 11284382

Health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and regulatory issues. An assessment of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) recommendations on the use of HR-QOL measures in drug approval.

G Apolone1, G De Carli, M Brunetti, S Garattini.   

Abstract

Interest in measuring qualitative aspects of life that are most closely related to health and healthcare has increased in recent years. Methods of describing patients' subjective health status now incorporate standardised measures, and several psychometric measures are available. Despite the thousands of empirical and conceptual papers in the medical and pharmacological literature on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), the value of such measures in the regulatory process is still being debated. We conducted an assessment to understand and document the position of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) on the use of HR-QOL measures in studies conducted for regulatory purposes. Official documents produced and circulated by the EMEA containing recommendations on trial design, conduct and analysis for sponsors and scientific experts were independently reviewed by authors to document the position of the Agency on the specific topic of HR-QOL. All documents found in the Agency website on 30 September 1999 were identified and then assessed to: (i) identify diseases or drugs for which formal HR-QOL assessment is recommended; (ii) identify measures and methods recommended; and (iii) evaluate the reliability of recommendations across documents. Of the 189 documents retrieved, none focused directly on health-related quality of life. A few explicit recommendations were identified for 13 specific drugs or conditions. These recommendations were mostly general and vague, and used nonstandard terminology. In addition, terminology and recommendations were not consistent across documents and, in at least one case, were in contrast with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines. EMEA guidelines incorporating quality-of-life outcomes are welcomed but it is obvious that more detailed guidance is required. Closer collaboration between the EMEA and the FDA is also recommended. Experts from different disciplines should be involved in the preparation of such documents to assure the necessary technical expertise and the representativeness of the various counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11284382     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200119020-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  18 in total

1.  Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; A Fletcher; S Gore; D Jones; D Spiegelhalter; D Cox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-31

Review 2.  Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Deyo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The problem of quality of life in medicine.

Authors:  A Leplège; S Hunt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-07-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Defining and measuring quality of life in medicine.

Authors:  G Apolone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-02-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Review of the concept of quality of life assessment and discussion of the present trend in clinical research.

Authors:  G Apolone; P Mosconi
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 6.  Standards for validating health measures: definition and content.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes.

Authors:  M A Testa; D C Simonson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes.

Authors:  I B Wilson; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life after surgery of the alimentary tract.

Authors:  Marco Scarpa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  An empowerment-based educational program improves psychological well-being and health-related quality of life in Type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  G Forlani; C Zannoni; G Tarrini; N Melchionda; G Marchesini
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  Evaluation of quality of life in individuals with severe chronic motor disability: A major challenge.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Rousseau; Karine Baumstarck; Thierry Billette de Villemeur; Pascal Auquier
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2016-05

4.  Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: First Health-related Quality-of-Life Measures for Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Sharon D Dell; Margaret W Leigh; Jane S Lucas; Thomas W Ferkol; Michael R Knowles; Adrianne Alpern; Laura Behan; Anjana M Morris; Claire Hogg; Audrey DunnGalvin; Alexandra L Quittner
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-10

5.  Health-related quality of life in patients with thyroid disorders.

Authors:  G P Bianchi; V Zaccheroni; E Solaroli; F Vescini; R Cerutti; M Zoli; G Marchesini
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Novel strategies in immune checkpoint inhibitor drug development: How far are we from the paradigm shift?

Authors:  Geoffrey Alan Watson; Jeffrey Doi; Aaron Richard Hansen; Anna Spreafico
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Cognitive behavioural therapy for obesity: one-year follow-up in a clinical setting.

Authors:  N Melchionda; L Besteghi; S Di Domizio; F Pasqui; C Nuccitelli; S Migliorini; L Baraldi; S Natale; R Manini; M Bellini; C Belsito; G Forlani; G Marchesini
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  Validation of pediatric health-related quality of life instruments for primary ciliary dyskinesia (QOL-PCD).

Authors:  Laura Behan; Margaret W Leigh; Sharon D Dell; Alexandra L Quittner; Claire Hogg; Jane S Lucas
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2019-09-01

Review 9.  Measuring Patient Quality of Life Following Treatment for Alopecia.

Authors:  Kunlawat Thadanipon; Poonkiat Suchonwanit
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Measuring the quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis in clinical practice: a necessary challenge.

Authors:  Karine Baumstarck; Laurent Boyer; Mohamed Boucekine; Pierre Michel; Jean Pelletier; Pascal Auquier
Journal:  Mult Scler Int       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.