Literature DB >> 14674726

Bouts of responding from variable-interval reinforcement of lever pressing by rats.

Richard L Shull1, Julie A Grimes.   

Abstract

Four rats obtained food pellets by lever pressing. A variable-interval reinforcement schedule assigned reinforcers on average every 2 min during one block of 20 sessions and on average every 8 min during another block. Also, at each variable-interval duration, a block of sessions was conducted with a schedule that imposed a variable-ratio 4 response requirement after each variable interval (i.e., a tandem variable-time variable-ratio 4 schedule). The total rate of lever pressing increased as a function of the rate of reinforcement and as a result of imposing the variable-ratio requirement. Analysis of log survivor plots of interresponse times indicated that lever pressing occurred in bouts that were separated by pauses. Increasing the rate of reinforcement increased total response rate by increasing the rate of initiating bouts and, less reliably, by lengthening bouts. Imposing the variable-ratio component increased response rate mainly by lengthening bouts. This pattern of results is similar to that reported previously with key poking as the response. Also, response rates within bouts were relatively insensitive to either variable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14674726      PMCID: PMC1284951          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  To split behaviour into bouts, log-transform the intervals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.

Authors:  J A Nevin; S Holland; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preratio pausing: effects of an alternative reinforcer on fixed- and variable-ratio responding.

Authors:  Adam Derenne; Alan Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Molecular analyses of the principal components of response strength.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Scott S Hall; Mark P Reilly; Lauren C Kettle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  From molecular to molar: a paradigm shift in behavior analysis.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Fundamental dimensional properties of the operant.

Authors:  T F GILBERT
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Punishment and recovery during fixed-ratio performance.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-10       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Satiation effects under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  M SIDMAN; W C STEBBINS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-04

9.  Running time as a function of amount of food deprivation.

Authors:  J W COTTON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-09

10.  The effect of reinforcement magnitude upon responding under fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  R W Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  19 in total

1.  Bouts of responding: the relation between bout rate and the rate of variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  Richard L Shull; Julie A Grimes; J Adam Bennett
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent VR VI schedules: primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Resistance to change of responding maintained by unsignaled delays to reinforcement: a response-bout analysis.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Ryan D Ward; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  An analytic form for the interresponse time analysis of Shull, Gaynor, and Grimes with applications and extensions.

Authors:  Robert Kessel; Robert L Lucke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Interresponse time structures in variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Matthew T Bowers; Jade Hill; William L Palya
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The isolation of motivational, motoric, and schedule effects on operant performance: a modeling approach.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Timothy H C Cheung; Janet L Neisewander; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  A bout analysis of operant response disruption.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Timothy H C Cheung; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 9.  A computational formulation of the behavior systems account of the temporal organization of motivated behavior.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Carter W Daniels; Tanya Gupta; Cristina Santos
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  A bout analysis reveals age-related methylmercury neurotoxicity and nimodipine neuroprotection.

Authors:  Andrew Nathanael Shen; Craig Cummings; Derek Pope; Daniel Hoffman; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.