Literature DB >> 14674633

Vibrotactile localization on the arm: effects of place, space, and age.

Roger W Cholewiak1, Amy A Collins.   

Abstract

Although tactile acuity has been explored for touch stimuli, vibrotactile resolution on the skin has not. In the present experiments, we explored the ability to localize vibrotactile stimuli on a linear array of tactors on the forearm. We examined the influence of a number of stimulus parameters, including the frequency of the vibratory stimulus, the locations of the stimulus sites on the body relative to specific body references or landmarks, the proximity among driven loci, and the age of the observer. Stimulus frequency and age group showed much less of an effect on localization than was expected. The position of stimulus sites relative to body landmarks and the separation among sites exerted the strongest influence on localization accuracy, and these effects could be mimicked by introducing an "artificial" referent into the tactile array.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14674633     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  27 in total

1.  Eye position affects the perceived location of touch.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Supplemental vibrotactile feedback of real-time limb position enhances precision of goal-directed reaching.

Authors:  Nicoletta Risi; Valay Shah; Leigh A Mrotek; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reference frames for coding touch location depend on the task.

Authors:  Lisa M Pritchett; Michael J Carnevale; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual detail about the body modulates tactile localisation biases.

Authors:  Aaron N Margolis; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Whole-hand perceptual maps of joint location.

Authors:  Kasia A Myga; Klaudia B Ambroziak; Luigi Tamè; Alessandro Farnè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Tactile length contraction as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Jonathan Tong; Vy Ngo; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Tactile localization biases are modulated by gaze direction.

Authors:  Sonia Medina; Luigi Tamè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  What can errors tell us about body representations?

Authors:  Jared Medina; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Vibrotactile feedback for brain-computer interface operation.

Authors:  Febo Cincotti; Laura Kauhanen; Fabio Aloise; Tapio Palomäki; Nicholas Caporusso; Pasi Jylänki; Donatella Mattia; Fabio Babiloni; Gerolf Vanacker; Marnix Nuttin; Maria Grazia Marciani; José Del R Millán
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.