Literature DB >> 30995149

Supplemental vibrotactile feedback of real-time limb position enhances precision of goal-directed reaching.

Nicoletta Risi1,2, Valay Shah1, Leigh A Mrotek1, Maura Casadio1,2,3, Robert A Scheidt1,3,4.   

Abstract

We examined vibrotactile stimulation as a form of supplemental limb state feedback to enhance planning and ongoing control of goal-directed movements. Subjects wore a two-dimensional vibrotactile display on their nondominant arm while performing horizontal planar reaching with the dominant arm. The vibrotactile display provided feedback of hand position such that small hand displacements were more easily discriminable using vibrotactile feedback than with intrinsic proprioceptive feedback. When subjects relied solely on proprioception to capture visuospatial targets, performance was degraded by proprioceptive drift and an expansion of task space. By contrast, reach accuracy was enhanced immediately when subjects were provided vibrotactile feedback and further improved over 2 days of training. Improvements reflected resolution of proprioceptive drift, which occurred only when vibrotactile feedback was active, demonstrating that benefits of vibrotactile feedback are due, in part to its integration into the ongoing control of movement. A partial resolution of task space expansion persisted even when vibrotactile feedback was inactive, demonstrating that training with vibrotactile feedback also induced changes in movement planning. However, the benefits of vibrotactile feedback come at a cognitive cost. All subjects adopted a stereotyped strategy wherein they attempted to capture targets by moving first along one axis of the vibrotactile display and then the other. For most subjects, this inefficient approach did not resolve over two bouts of training performed on separate days, suggesting that additional training is needed to integrate vibrotactile feedback into the planning and online control of goal-directed reaching in a way that promotes smooth and efficient movement. NEW & NOTEWORTHY A two-dimensional vibrotactile display provided state (not error) feedback to enhance control of a moving limb. Subjects learned to use state feedback to perform blind reaches with accuracy and precision exceeding that attained using intrinsic proprioception alone. Feedback utilization incurred substantial cognitive cost: subjects moved first along one axis of the vibrotactile display, then the other. This stereotyped control strategy must be overcome if vibrotactile limb state feedback is to promote naturalistic limb movements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decomposition; hand path; movement strategy; sensory augmentation; smooth

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30995149      PMCID: PMC6689770          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00337.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  53 in total

1.  Spatially selective enhancement of proprioceptive acuity following motor learning.

Authors:  Jeremy D Wong; Elizabeth T Wilson; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Michael A Conditt; Emanuele L Secco; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; H Poizner; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; A K Rao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Impaired discrimination of surface friction contributes to pinch grip deficit after stroke.

Authors:  Jannette M Blennerhassett; Thomas A Matyas; Leeanne M Carey
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery.

Authors:  L A Connell; N B Lincoln; K A Radford
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.477

8.  Human arm trajectory formation.

Authors:  W Abend; E Bizzi; P Morasso
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Robot-Assisted Proprioceptive Training with Added Vibro-Tactile Feedback Enhances Somatosensory and Motor Performance.

Authors:  Anna Vera Cuppone; Valentina Squeri; Marianna Semprini; Lorenzo Masia; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Multisensory integration during motor planning.

Authors:  Samuel J Sober; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  6 in total

1.  Object stiffness recognition using haptic feedback delivered through transcutaneous proximal nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; Henry Shin; He Helen Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Effects of a robot-aided somatosensory training on proprioception and motor function in stroke survivors.

Authors:  I-Ling Yeh; Jessica Holst-Wolf; Naveen Elangovan; Anna Vera Cuppone; Kamakshi Lakshminarayan; Leonardo Cappello; Lorenzo Masia; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.208

3.  Spatial and temporal influences on discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli on the arm.

Authors:  Valay A Shah; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt; Leigh A Mrotek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effect of Short-Term Exposure to Supplemental Vibrotactile Kinesthetic Feedback on Goal-Directed Movements after Stroke: A Proof of Concept Case Series.

Authors:  Giulia Ballardini; Alexis Krueger; Psiche Giannoni; Lucio Marinelli; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Vibrotactile Perception for Sensorimotor Augmentation: Perceptual Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli Induced by Low-Cost Eccentric Rotating Mass Motors at Different Body Locations in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.

Authors:  Ella Pomplun; Ashiya Thomas; Erin Corrigan; Valay A Shah; Leigh A Mrotek; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-07-01

6.  The effect of tactile augmentation on manipulation and grip force control during force-field adaptation.

Authors:  Chen Avraham; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.262

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.