Literature DB >> 146731

Reoperation after lumbar intervertebral disc surgery.

J D Law, R A Lehman, W M Kirsch.   

Abstract

This retrospective study includes 53 patients who underwent reoperation after failure of lumbar disc surgery to relieve pain. All patients had leg pain before reoperation, which was successful in 28% of cases. Most clinical features, such as persistence or mode of recurrence of pain, radicular quality of pain, positive straight-leg raising, and myelographic root sleeve defects, were not helpful in predicting successful and unsuccessful reoperations. However, a significantly larger percentage of women than men had successful reoperations. Patients who had past or pending compensation claims, who had sensory loss involving more than one dermatome, or who failed to have myelographic dural sac indentations resembling those caused by a herniated disc did poorly with reoperation. A very convincing myelographic defect appears to be needed to justify reoperation at a previously unoperated location. Excision of scar alone or dorsal rhizotomy was of no avail in these cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 146731     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1978.48.2.0259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  31 in total

1.  New approaches to treatment of back pain.

Authors:  K M Wood
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1979-04

2.  Failed back surgery syndrome: a suggested algorithm of care.

Authors:  Praveen Ganty; Manohar Sharma
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2012-11

3.  Contrast enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrent disc herniation.

Authors:  M J Albeck; A Wagner; L L Knudsen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and myelography in the diagnosis of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  M J Albeck; L Kjaer; J Praestholm; A Vestergaard; O Henriksen; F Gjerris
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Risk factors for the need of surgical treatment of a first recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Ratko Yurac; Juan J Zamorano; Fernando Lira; Diego Valiente; Vicente Ballesteros; Alejandro Urzúa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Treatment of cervical disc disease using Cloward's technique. Part V. The effect of reoperations.

Authors:  J O Espersen; A Klaerke; M Buhl; E F Eriksen; K Fode; L Krøyer; H Lindeberg; C B Madsen; P Strange; L Wohlert
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 7.  Analgesic therapy for major spine surgery.

Authors:  Varun Puvanesarajah; Jason A Liauw; Sheng-fu Lo; Ioan A Lina; Timothy F Witham; Allan Gottschalk
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD).

Authors:  H M Mayer; M Brock
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery: results in 130 cases.

Authors:  J Fandiño; C Botana; A Viladrich; J Gomez-Bueno
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Contrast-enhanced MRI versus myelography and contrast-enhanced CT in postdiskectomy problems.

Authors:  M Annertz; G Hägglund; S Holtås; B Jönsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.