Literature DB >> 24785601

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shayna N Conner1, Heather A Frey, Alison G Cahill, George A Macones, Graham A Colditz, Methodius G Tuuli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) increases the risk for preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation and clarify whether the increased risk for preterm birth is attributable to the procedure itself or to risk factors associated with cervical dysplasia. DATA SOURCES: Two authors performed a search of the relevant data through February 2013 using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included observational studies that compared rates of preterm birth in women with prior LEEP with women with no history of cervical excision. Nineteen of 559 identified studies met selection criteria. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND
RESULTS: We compared women with a history of LEEP with two unexposed groups without a history of cervical excision: 1) women with an unknown or no history of cervical dysplasia; and 2) women with a history of cervical dysplasia but no cervical excision. The primary outcome was preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes were preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation, spontaneous preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and perinatal mortality. DerSimonian-Laird random effects models were used. We assessed heterogeneity between studies using the Q and I tests. Stratified analyses and metaregression were performed to assess confounding. Nineteen studies were included with a total of 6,589 patients with a history of LEEP and 1,415,015 without. Overall, LEEP was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation (pooled relative risk 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.92). However, no increased risk was found when women with a history of LEEP were compared with women with a history cervical dysplasia but no cervical excision (pooled relative risk 1.08, 95% CI 0.88-1.33).
CONCLUSION: Women with a history of LEEP have similar risk of preterm birth when compared with women with prior dysplasia but no cervical excision. Common risk factors for both preterm birth and dysplasia likely explain findings of association between LEEP and preterm birth, but LEEP itself may not be an independent risk factor for preterm birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24785601      PMCID: PMC4113318          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  31 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Preterm delivery after surgical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Maija Jakobsson; Mika Gissler; Susanna Sainio; Jorma Paavonen; Anna-Maija Tapper
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery.

Authors:  Bugge Nøhr; Ann Tabor; Kirsten Frederiksen; Susanne Krüger Kjaer
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Incidence and costs of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a US commercially insured population.

Authors:  Henry J Henk; Ralph P Insinga; Puneet K Singhal; Theodore Darkow
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy.

Authors:  G Ortoft; Tb Henriksen; Es Hansen; Lk Petersen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors.

Authors:  L Stewart Massad; Mark H Einstein; Warner K Huh; Hormuzd A Katki; Walter K Kinney; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon; Nicolas Wentzensen; Herschel W Lawson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

Authors:  D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Time from cervical conization to pregnancy and preterm birth.

Authors:  Katherine P Himes; Hyagriv N Simhan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Infant mortality statistics from the 2008 period linked birth/infant death data set.

Authors:  T J Mathews; Marian F MacDorman
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2012-05-10

Review 10.  Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Arbyn; M Kyrgiou; C Simoens; A O Raifu; G Koliopoulos; P Martin-Hirsch; W Prendiville; E Paraskevaidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-18
View more
  17 in total

1.  Application value of different transformation zone types and its genetic relationship with high-risk HPV type in diagnosis and therapy of cervical disease.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Jia-De Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

2.  See-and-Treat for High-Grade Cytology: Do Young Women Have Different Rates of High-Grade Histology?

Authors:  Haller J Smith; Charles A Leath; Warner K Huh; Britt K Erickson
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of vaginal infections during pregnancy: an observational study.

Authors:  M J Stout; H A Frey; M G Tuuli; A G Cahill; A O Odibo; K A Roehl; G A Macones
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 4.  Population-based screening for cancer: hope and hype.

Authors:  Yiwey Shieh; Martin Eklund; George F Sawaya; William C Black; Barnett S Kramer; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Excisional Treatment of Cervical Dysplasia in Australia 2004-2013: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Gregory Robertson; Stephen J Robson
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.375

6.  Knowledge of HPV and Surgery among Women Who Underwent Cervical Conization: A Korean Multi-Center Study.

Authors:  So Yeun Jun; Se Ik Kim; Myong Cheol Lim; Jung Yun Lee; San Hui Lee; Yong Jung Song; Kyoung Chul Chun; Jae Weon Kim; Sang Yoon Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Risk of preterm birth following surgical treatment for cervical disease: executive summary of a recent symposium.

Authors:  P Sasieni; A Castanon; R Landy; M Kyrgiou; H Kitchener; M Quigley; Lcy Poon; A Shennan; A Hollingworth; W P Soutter; T Freeman-Wang; D Peebles; W Prendiville; J Patnick
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 8.  Prevention of preterm delivery: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Maud D van Zijl; Bouchra Koullali; Ben Wj Mol; Eva Pajkrt; Martijn A Oudijk
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-10-31

9.  Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for preinvasive cervical lesions.

Authors:  Ioannis Biliatis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-07-28

Review 10.  Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Kyrgiou; Antonios Athanasiou; Maria Paraskevaidi; Anita Mitra; Ilkka Kalliala; Pierre Martin-Hirsch; Marc Arbyn; Phillip Bennett; Evangelos Paraskevaidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.