Literature DB >> 14669963

Patellofemoral kinematics during weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing knee extension in persons with lateral subluxation of the patella: a preliminary study.

Christopher M Powers1, Samuel R Ward, Michael Fredericson, Marc Guillet, Frank G Shellock.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Single-group, repeated-measures design.
OBJECTIVE: To compare patellofemoral joint kinematics during weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing knee extension in persons with lateral subluxation of the patella.
BACKGROUND: The only previous study to quantify differences in patellofemoral joint kinematics during weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing tasks was limited in that static loading conditions were utilized. Differences in patellofemoral joint kinematics between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions have not been quantified during dynamic movement. METHODS AND MEASURES: Six females with a diagnosis of patellofemoral pain and lateral subluxation of the patella participated. Using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging, axial images of the patellofemoral joint were obtained as subjects extended their knee from 45 degrees to 0 degrees during non-weight-bearing (5% body weight resistance) and weight-bearing (unilateral squat) conditions. Measurements of patellofemoral joint relationships (medial/lateral patellar displacement and patellar tilt), as well as femur and patella rotations relative to an external reference system (ie, the image field of view), were obtained at 3 degrees increments during knee extension.
RESULTS: During non-weight-bearing knee extension, lateral patellar displacement was more pronounced than during the weight-bearing condition between 30 degrees and 12 degrees of knee extension, with statistical significance being reached at 27 degrees, 24 degrees, and 21 degrees. No differences in lateral patellar tilt were observed between conditions (P = .065). During the weight-bearing condition, internal femoral rotation was significantly greater than during the non-weight-bearing condition as the knee extended from 18 degrees to 0 degrees. During the non-weight-bearing condition, the amount of lateral patellar rotation was significantly greater than during the weight-bearing condition throughout the range of motion tested.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that lateral patellar displacement was more pronounced during non-weight-bearing knee extension compared to weight-bearing knee extension in persons with lateral patellar subluxation. In addition, the results of this investigation suggest that the patellofemoral joint kinematics during non-weight-bearing could be characterized as the patella rotating on the femur, while the patellofemoral joint kinematics during the weight-bearing condition could be characterized as the femur rotating underneath the patella.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14669963     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.11.677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  83 in total

1.  Comparison of hip and knee strength and neuromuscular activity in subjects with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Lori A Bolgla; Terry R Malone; Brian R Umberger; Timothy L Uhl
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12

2.  Quantifying the effects of extensor mechanism medializatlon procedures using MRI: a cadaver-based study.

Authors:  Kyle Duchman; Chloe Mellecker; Daniel R Thedens; John P Albright
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2011

3.  Upright weight-bearing CT of the knee during flexion: changes of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral articulations between 0° and 120°.

Authors:  Anna Hirschmann; Florian M Buck; Ramin Herschel; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A methodology to accurately quantify patellofemoral cartilage contact kinematics by combining 3D image shape registration and cine-PC MRI velocity data.

Authors:  Bhushan S Borotikar; William H Sipprell; Emily E Wible; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Gender differences in trunk, pelvis and lower limb kinematics during a single leg squat.

Authors:  Valentina Graci; Linda R Van Dillen; Gretchen B Salsich
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Do females with patellofemoral pain have abnormal hip and knee kinematics during gait?

Authors:  Gretchen B Salsich; Frances Long-Rossi
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Dynamic measurement of patellofemoral kinematics and contact pressure after lateral retinacular release: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sven Ostermeier; Marc Holst; Christof Hurschler; Henning Windhagen; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Predicting three-dimensional patellofemoral kinematics from static imaging-based alignment measures.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  The effects of pediatric obesity on patellofemoral joint contact force during walking.

Authors:  Namwoong Kim; Raymond C Browning; Zachary F Lerner
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Eccentric hip muscle function in females with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Rodrigo de Marche Baldon; Theresa Helissa Nakagawa; Thiago Batista Muniz; César Ferreira Amorim; Carlos Dias Maciel; Fábio Viadanna Serrão
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.