Literature DB >> 24587605

Laparoscopic Gynae-oncological Procedures: Lessons Learnt After a Single Institution Audit of Complications and Their Management in 567 Consecutive Patients.

Shailesh P Puntambekar1, Geetanjali A Agrawal1, Saurabh N Joshi1, Neeraj V Rayate1, D N B Saravana1, Avanish V Deshmukh1.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the complications of the laparoscopic pelvic surgeries and to formulate the guidelines to avoid them.
DESIGN: Retrospective study (Canadian Classification).
SETTING: Advanced Laparoscopic Institute. PATIENTS: Nine hundred and seven operated for gynecological malignancies. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic surgeries.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 567 women suffering from different pelvic conditions were studied in a period of 60 months. The median age of the patient was 35 (11-80). Complications occurred in 32 patients (32/567, 5.5 %). The overall incidence of urinary tract injury in all the advanced cases at our institute was 2.1 % (12/567). The incidence of bowel injury at our center was 1.76 %. The incidence of vascular injury at our institute was 1.76 % (10/567).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic complications are different than those seen following open surgeries. Anticipation, early recognition, and timely intervention help to reduce morbidity. Laparoscopic management of complications is possible. Formulating standard guidelines can help to avoid many such complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Gynaecology; Laparoscopic surgery

Year:  2013        PMID: 24587605      PMCID: PMC3931907          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-013-0446-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  11 in total

1.  Major retroperitoneal vascular injury during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  C Nezhat; J Childers; F Nezhat; C H Nezhat; D S Seidman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Recent results of elective open cholecystectomy in a North American and a European center. Comparison of complications and risk factors.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; G Mentha; F Borst; L Buhler; B Roche; R Cywes; R Tibshirani; A Rohner; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists' 1988 membership survey on operative laparoscopy.

Authors:  H B Peterson; J F Hulka; J M Phillips
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 0.142

5.  Is total laparoscopic hysterectomy a safe surgical procedure?

Authors:  C M Chapron; J B Dubuisson; Y Ansquer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy with psoas hitch.

Authors:  Shailesh Puntambekar; Reshma J Palep; Ajit M Gurjar; Ravindra M Sathe; Amol G Talaulikar; Geetanjali A Agarwal; Madhuri Kashyap
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study.

Authors:  F W Jansen; K Kapiteyn; T Trimbos-Kemper; J Hermans; J B Trimbos
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1997-05

8.  Major vascular injury during gynecologic laparoscopy. Report of a case and review of published cases.

Authors:  S E Baadsgaard; S Bille; K Egeblad
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Definition and classification of negative outcomes in solid organ transplantation. Application in liver transplantation.

Authors:  P A Clavien; C A Camargo; R Croxford; B Langer; G A Levy; P D Greig
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Abdominal wall characterization with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. The effect of obesity on the laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  W H Hurd; R O Bude; J O DeLancey; J M Gauvin; A M Aisen
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 0.142

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.