Literature DB >> 21279688

Utility of transthoracic echocardiography to estimate severity of right ventricular dysfunction: an MRI comparison study.

Suraj Kapa1, Richard Elias, Heidi J Connolly, Imran S Syed, Samuel J Asirvatham.   

Abstract

Prognostic implications of severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction are difficult to assess because of limitations in functional characterization using standard echocardiography (TTE) and the cost and availability of options such as MRI. We sought to determine how assessments of RV dysfunction via TTE correlate with RV ejection fraction (EF) by MRI. Patients undergoing MRI and TTE within 21 days of one another were included. Left ventricular (LV) and RV EF were recorded from MRI and subjective assessment of RV function (normal, mild, moderate, or severe dysfunction), right ventricular index of myocardial performance (RIMP), and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) were recorded from TTE. Patients were considered to have significant RV dysfunction if EF ≤ 35% on MRI and normal function if EF ≥ 45%. A total of 474 patients were included (age 50 ± 12, 57% male). Of these, 363 (76.6%) had normal function, 54 (11.4%) had mild dysfunction, 41 (8.6%) had moderate dysfunction, and 16 (3.4%) had severe dysfunction on TTE. Moderate or severe dysfunction had good sensitivity (80%) and specificity (97%) for RV EF ≤ 35%. Furthermore, RIMP > 0.70 and RVSP > 70 mm Hg were very specific for RV EF ≤ 35% (sensitivity = 29%, 22%, respectively; specificity = 98%, 99%, respectively). Specificity and sensitivity of TTE assessments did not change if LV function or disease indication was considered. A subjective assessment of moderate to severe RV dysfunction on TTE compares favorably with quantitative MRI assessment of the RV EF. Further study is needed to evaluate whether this comparability is true across institutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21279688     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9810-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  42 in total

1.  The relation between quantitative right ventricular ejection fraction and indices of tricuspid annular motion and myocardial performance.

Authors:  Darryl Miller; Michel G Farah; Anna Liner; Keith Fox; Mark Schluchter; Brian D Hoit
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  Lawrence G Rudski; Wyman W Lai; Jonathan Afilalo; Lanqi Hua; Mark D Handschumacher; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Scott D Solomon; Eric K Louie; Nelson B Schiller
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 3.  Right ventricular function in cardiovascular disease, part I: Anatomy, physiology, aging, and functional assessment of the right ventricle.

Authors:  François Haddad; Sharon A Hunt; David N Rosenthal; Daniel J Murphy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Ethical authorship and publishing.

Authors:  Andrew J S Coats
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Functional implications of the right ventricular myocardial performance index in patients after surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Eddie W Y Cheung; Wendy W M Lam; Stephen C W Cheung; Yiu-Fai Cheung
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Comparative values of gated blood-pool SPECT and CMR for ejection fraction and volume estimation.

Authors:  Louis Sibille; Fayçal Ben Bouallegue; Aurélie Bourdon; Antoine Micheau; Hélène Vernhet-Kovacsik; Denis Mariano-Goulart
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 7.  Doppler echocardiography: theory, instrumentation, technique, and application.

Authors:  R A Nishimura; F A Miller; M J Callahan; R C Benassi; J B Seward; A J Tajik
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Doppler echocardiographic index for assessment of global right ventricular function.

Authors:  C Tei; K S Dujardin; D O Hodge; K R Bailey; M D McGoon; A J Tajik; S B Seward
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Is myocardial performance index an independent echocardiographic marker of death in children with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?

Authors:  Vitor Manuel P Azevedo; Francisco M Albanesi Filho; Marco Aurélio Santos; Márcia B Castier; Bernardo R Tura; José Geraldo Amino; Maria Ourinda Mesquita Da Cunha
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging: the preferred imaging method for evaluation of the right ventricle.

Authors:  L H B Baur
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.357

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Non-targeted metabolomics identify polyamine metabolite acisoga as novel biomarker for reduced left ventricular function.

Authors:  Andreas Puetz; Anna Artati; Jerzy Adamski; Katharina Schuett; Francesco Romeo; Robert Stoehr; Nikolaus Marx; Massimo Federici; Michael Lehrke; Ben A Kappel
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-11-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.