Literature DB >> 14661244

Neovascularization of poly(ether ester) block-copolymer scaffolds in vivo: long-term investigations using intravital fluorescent microscopy.

Daniel Druecke1, Stefan Langer, Evert Lamme, Jeroen Pieper, Marija Ugarkovic, Hans Ulrich Steinau, Heinz Herbert Homann.   

Abstract

Poly(ether ester) block-copolymer scaffolds of different pore size were implanted into the dorsal skinfold chamber of balb/c mice. Using intravital fluorescent microscopy, the temporal course of neovascularization into these scaffolds was quantitatively analyzed. Three scaffold groups (diameter, 5 mm; 220-260 thickness, microm; n = 30) were implanted. Different pore sizes were evaluated: small (20-75 microm), medium (75-212 microm) and large pores (250-300 microm). Measurements were performed on days 8, 12, 16, and 20 in the surrounding normal tissue, in the border zone, and in the center of the scaffold. Standard microcirculatory parameters were assessed (plasma leakage, vessel diameter, red blood cell velocity, and functional vessel density). The large-pored scaffolds showed significantly higher functional vessel density in the border zone and in the center (days 8 and 12) compared with the scaffold with the small and medium-sized pores. These data correlated with a larger vessel diameter and a higher red blood cell velocity in the large-pored scaffold group. Interestingly, during the evaluation period the microcirculatory parameters on the edge of the scaffolds returned to values similar to those found in the surrounding tissue. In the center of the scaffold, however, neovascularization was still active 20 days after implantation. Plasma leakage and vessel diameter were higher in the center of the scaffold. Red blood cell velocity and functional vessel density were 50% lower than in the surrounding tissue. In conclusion, the dorsal skinfold chamber model in mice allows long-term study of blood vessel growth and remodeling in porous biomedical materials. The rate of vessel ingrowth into poly(ether ester) block-copolymer scaffolds is influenced by pore size and was highest in the scaffold with the largest pores. The data generated with this model contribute to knowledge about the development of functional vessels and tissue ingrowth into biomaterials. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 68A: 10-18, 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14661244     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.20016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  34 in total

1.  Effects of designed PLLA and 50:50 PLGA scaffold architectures on bone formation in vivo.

Authors:  Eiji Saito; Elly E Liao; Wei-Wen Hu; Paul H Krebsbach; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.963

2.  Optimally porous and biomechanically compatible scaffolds for large-area bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Douglas J Adams; Cato T Laurencin; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Bone Tissue Engineering with Multilayered Scaffolds-Part I: An Approach for Vascularizing Engineered Constructs In Vivo.

Authors:  Binulal Nelson Sathy; Ullas Mony; Deepthy Menon; V K Baskaran; Antonios G Mikos; Shantikumar Nair
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  A critical analysis of current in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis assays.

Authors:  Carolyn A Staton; Malcolm W R Reed; Nicola J Brown
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Pro-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory regulation by functional peptides loaded in polymeric implants for soft tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Angela L Zachman; Spencer W Crowder; Ophir Ortiz; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Christine M Bronikowski; Shann S Yu; Todd D Giorgio; Scott A Guelcher; Joachim Kohn; Hak-Joon Sung
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Manipulating the intersection of angiogenesis and inflammation.

Authors:  Brian J Kwee; David J Mooney
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Engineering the vasculature for islet transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel T Bowers; Wei Song; Long-Hai Wang; Minglin Ma
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 8.  Defining and designing polymers and hydrogels for neural tissue engineering.

Authors:  Emily R Aurand; Kyle J Lampe; Kimberly B Bjugstad
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.304

Review 9.  Heart regeneration with engineered myocardial tissue.

Authors:  Kareen L K Coulombe; Vivek K Bajpai; Stelios T Andreadis; Charles E Murry
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 9.590

10.  Biomaterials for pluripotent stem cell engineering: From fate determination to vascularization.

Authors:  Nailah M Seale; Shyni Varghese
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 6.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.