Literature DB >> 14659349

A qualitative study looking at the psychosocial implications of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy.

M Bebbington Hatcher1, L J Fallowfield.   

Abstract

The study objective was to explore the attitudes and beliefs of women at high risk of developing breast cancer who accepted or declined bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM). This qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews of 60 women who opted for BPM and 20 women who declined. Interviews took place in the women's own homes. Qualitative analysis led to the generation of a number of categories that provided conceptualisation of the women's primary experiences. These categories included: anxiety; surgery; sexual impact; information; gene testing; reconstruction and support. The study revealed that there is a clear need for information to be written specifically for this patient group and that emotional support for high-risk women offered BPM should be provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14659349     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(02)00135-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  10 in total

1.  Heightened perception of breast cancer risk in young women at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachael Glassey; Moira O'Connor; Angela Ives; Christobel Saunders; Sarah O'Sullivan; Sarah J Hardcastle
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

Authors:  D St-Pierre; K Bouchard; L Gauthier; J Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Looking different, feeling different: women's reactions to risk-reducing breast and ovarian surgery.

Authors:  Nina Hallowell; Brandi Baylock; Louise Heiniger; Phyllis N Butow; Deepa Patel; Bettina Meiser; Christobel Saunders; Melanie A Price
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Understanding Preoperative Breast Satisfaction among Patients Undergoing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction: BREAST-Q Insights.

Authors:  Meghana G Shamsunder; Thais O Polanco; Colleen M McCarthy; Robert J Allen; Evan Matros; Michelle Coriddi; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea Pusic; Jonas A Nelson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Nora E Carbine; Liz Lostumbo; Judi Wallace; Henry Ko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-05

6.  Emotions and coping of patients with head and neck cancers after diagnosis: A qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  A Jagannathan; S Juvva
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.476

7.  Commentary: Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy is the safest strategy in BRCA1 carriers.

Authors:  Rachael Glassey; Christobel Saunders; Sarah J Hardcastle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-31

8.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used for Assessing Breast Sensation after Mastectomy: Not Fit for Purpose.

Authors:  Hansje P Smeele; Rachel C H Dijkstra; Merel L Kimman; René R W J van der Hulst; Stefania M H Tuinder
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Psychosocial aspects of risk appraisal.

Authors:  Lesley Fallowfield
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Time to decide about risk-reducing mastectomy: a case series of BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers.

Authors:  Mary McCullum; Joan L Bottorff; Mary Kelly; Stephanie A Kieffer; Lynda G Balneaves
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.809

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.