Literature DB >> 14659307

Socioeconomic status & returning for a second screen in the Ontario breast screening program.

R K Tatla1, L F Paszat, S J Bondy, Z Chen, A M Chiarelli, Verna Mai.   

Abstract

In a retrospective cohort study involving 57902 women initially screened between January 1, 1995 and December 31 1997 by the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP), we examined the relationship between geographically derived socioeconomic status (SES) and returning for a second screen. We controlled for age, rurality, preferred language, initial mammography results, previous mammography history, and referral by a health professional. Although SES was related to returning, rurality was an effect modifier of this relationship, a finding not previously reported. Compared to women in the highest ('richest') quintile, urban women in the first and second quintile were less likely to return; this relationship was not found in rural women. Low SES women, particularly in urban areas, should be specifically targeted to increase their likelihood of re-attendance for breast cancer screening within an organized program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14659307     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00100-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  15 in total

Review 1.  Increasing screening mammography among immigrant and minority women in Canada: a review of past interventions.

Authors:  Nour Schoueri-Mychasiw; Sharon Campbell; Verna Mai
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2013-02

2.  Searching for How Best to Accomplish Recommended Rescreening for Genital Chlamydia Infection.

Authors:  Noreen A Hynes
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Determinants of non-compliance to recommendations on breast cancer screening among women participating in the French E3N cohort study.

Authors:  Camille Flamant; Estelle Gauthier; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Concordance of population-based estimates of mammography screening.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Casey L Luce; Evette Ludman; Amy E Bonomi; Paul A Fishman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  The supply of physicians and care for breast cancer in Ontario and California, 1998 to 2006.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Isaac N Luginaah; Caroline Hamm; Madhan Balagurusamy; Eric J Holowaty
Journal:  Can J Rural Med       Date:  2011

6.  Where a cancer patient dies: the effect of rural residency.

Authors:  Frederick Burge; Beverley Lawson; Grace Johnston
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Cancer survival in Ontario, 1986-2003: evidence of equitable advances across most diverse urban and rural places.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Karen Y Fung; Isaac N Luginaah; Emma Bartfay; Caroline Hamm; Frances C Wright; Madhan Balagurusamy; Aziz Mohammad; Eric J Holowaty; Kathy X Tang
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb

8.  Organized breast screening improves reattendance compared to physician referral: a case control study.

Authors:  Ilia Makedonov; Sumei Gu; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  K Hanson; P Montgomery; D Bakker; M Conlon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Determinants Associated With Longitudinal Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Analysis of Claims Data.

Authors:  Erin A Hirsch; Anna E Barón; Betsy Risendal; Jamie L Studts; Melissa L New; Stephen P Malkoski
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.