Literature DB >> 16374226

Determinants of non-compliance to recommendations on breast cancer screening among women participating in the French E3N cohort study.

Camille Flamant1, Estelle Gauthier, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon.   

Abstract

Evidence of the benefits of screening for breast cancer using mammography after the age of 50 is considered sufficient. Information on the determinants of compliance to the recommendations on mammography is needed to identify women to which public health messages should be specifically addressed and also to interpret results from epidemiological data in which some breast cancer cases are detected through screening programmes and others are not. The general characteristics and dietary data of French women participating in the E3N cohort study were analysed. Odds ratios of the frequency of non-compliance to recommendations on breast cancer screening were computed in women over and under the age of 50. Non-compliant women over 50 (i.e. never attenders) had a poorer access to physicians and poorer health with regard to specific risk factors even after adjustment for age and educational level. Women who were used to referring to gynaecologists early in life were better attenders later on. Logically, women under 50 who were over-screened, as compared to public health recommendations, had the opposite characteristics. Public health recommendations should be designed specifically according to targeted subgroups of women. Determinants of attendance for screening should be kept in mind in the interpretation of epidemiological studies in which some cases may be over-screened and others not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16374226      PMCID: PMC2756596          DOI: 10.1097/01.cej.0000180666.11958.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  27 in total

1.  Breast and cervical cancer screening: sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Kate M Brett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, The Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92.

Authors:  J D Otten; J A van Dijck; P G Peer; H Straatman; A L Verbeek; M Mravunac; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.

Authors:  P E Schofield; J Cockburn; D J Hill; D Reading
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 4.  Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices.

Authors:  M T Ruffin; D W Gorenflo; B Woodman
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

5.  Medicare coverage, supplemental insurance, and the use of mammography by older women.

Authors:  J Blustein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Predictors of screening for breast and colorectal cancer among middle-aged women.

Authors:  Lorraine Silver Wallace; Rajeev Gupta
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves.

Authors:  P Hobbs; A Smith; W D George; R A Sellwood
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Predictors of cancer prevention attitudes and participation in cancer screening examinations.

Authors:  R M Bostick; J M Sprafka; B A Virnig; J D Potter
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma.

Authors:  Sophia Zackrisson; Ingvar Andersson; Jonas Manjer; Lars Janzon
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Determinants of non-attendance to mammographic screening. Analysis of a population sample of the screening program in the District of Florence.

Authors:  S Ciatto; S Cecchini; A Isu; A Maggi; S Cammelli
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1992-02-29
View more
  2 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening: evidence of benefit depends on the method used.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Psychosocial factors and attendance at a population-based mammography screening program in a cohort of Swedish women.

Authors:  Magdalena Lagerlund; Jessica M Sontrop; Sophia Zackrisson
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.809

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.