Literature DB >> 14657709

Declining estrogen receptor-beta expression defines malignant progression of human breast neoplasia.

Abeer M Shaaban1, Penny A O'Neill, Michael P A Davies, Ross Sibson, Christopher R West, Paul H Smith, Christopher S Foster.   

Abstract

It has been shown that the risk of breast cancer developing in certain morphologically identifiable benign breast lesions correlates with expression of estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha). Although ER-alpha and ER-beta genes share a large degree of homology, it is generally thought that their distribution and functions are substantially different in many tissues. Recent development of reliable antibodies to ER-beta has provided this first opportunity to test the hypothesis that the likelihood of malignant transformation in morphologically benign breast lesions can be accurately defined by the distribution and level of ER-beta expression relative to that of ER-alpha. Using a monoclonal antibody, ER-beta protein expression has been analyzed in 53 normal breasts and compared with a cohort of histologically distinct breast lesions of different prognostic risk (54 hyperplasia of usual type, 35 ductal carcinoma in situ, and 141 invasive cancers). All of these tissues were also assessed for ER-alpha. Expression of ER-beta protein was also analyzed in an additional spectrum of benign breast lesions with low or negligible risk of progression to malignancy. The median proportion of cells expressing ER-beta was highest in normal breast lobules (median 94.33%, interquartile range 78.25-99.00) but declined significantly through usual ductal hyperplasia (median 76.67, interquartile range 49.17-95.00, P = 0.002) and ductal carcinoma in situ (median 70.00, interquartile range 59.00-85.00, P = 0.009) to invasive cancer (median 60.00, interquartile range 50.00-80.00, P < 0.001). An appreciable proportion (33.81%) of ER-alpha-negative invasive cancers expressed ER-beta. A high but variable level of ER-beta expression occurred in the benign lesions. The data from the intact histologic tissues were evaluated with respect to the relative expression of ER-alpha and ER-beta in five mammary cell lines of different behavioral phenotype (MCF7, ZR-75, T47D, MDAMB231, HUMA121). The highly significant differences in expression and distinct tissue distributions of ER-alpha and ER-beta within the histologic lesions of defined risk, together with the data from the cell lines, support the original hypothesis that the tissue concentration, relative occurrence, and/or interaction of these two types of estrogen receptor may play an important role in modulating mammary tumorigenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14657709     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200312000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  68 in total

1.  ERβ expression and breast cancer risk prediction for women with atypias.

Authors:  Tina J Hieken; Jodi M Carter; John R Hawse; Tanya L Hoskin; Melanie Bois; Marlene Frost; Lynn C Hartmann; Derek C Radisky; Daniel W Visscher; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-08-14

Review 2.  Estrogen and progesterone receptors: from molecular structures to clinical targets.

Authors:  Stephan Ellmann; Heinrich Sticht; Falk Thiel; Matthias W Beckmann; Reiner Strick; Pamela L Strissel
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Genome-wide dynamics of chromatin binding of estrogen receptors alpha and beta: mutual restriction and competitive site selection.

Authors:  Tze Howe Charn; Edison Tak-Bun Liu; Edmund C Chang; Yew Kok Lee; John A Katzenellenbogen; Benita S Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-11-06

Review 4.  A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype.

Authors:  Michael S Shawky; Cecilia W Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Michael A Henderson; Andrew Redfern
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Pharmacological relevance of endoxifen in a laboratory simulation of breast cancer in postmenopausal patients.

Authors:  Philipp Y Maximov; Russell E McDaniel; Daphne J Fernandes; Puspanjali Bhatta; Valeriy R Korostyshevskiy; Ramona F Curpan; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Steroid hormone receptors as prognostic markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Maggie C Louie; Mary B Sevigny
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 7.  Minireview: modulation of hormone receptor signaling by dietary anticancer indoles.

Authors:  Gary L Firestone; Shyam N Sundar
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-10-16

8.  Indole-3-carbinol triggers aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent estrogen receptor (ER)alpha protein degradation in breast cancer cells disrupting an ERalpha-GATA3 transcriptional cross-regulatory loop.

Authors:  Crystal N Marconett; Shyam N Sundar; Kevin M Poindexter; Theresa R Stueve; Leonard F Bjeldanes; Gary L Firestone
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  A divergent role for estrogen receptor-beta in node-positive and node-negative breast cancer classified according to molecular subtypes: an observational prospective study.

Authors:  Flavia Novelli; Michele Milella; Elisa Melucci; Anna Di Benedetto; Isabella Sperduti; Raffaele Perrone-Donnorso; Letizia Perracchio; Irene Venturo; Cecilia Nisticò; Alessandra Fabi; Simonetta Buglioni; Pier Giorgio Natali; Marcella Mottolese
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  The evolving role of oestrogen receptor beta in clinical breast cancer.

Authors:  Valerie Speirs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.