Philipp Y Maximov1, Russell E McDaniel1, Daphne J Fernandes1, Puspanjali Bhatta1, Valeriy R Korostyshevskiy1, Ramona F Curpan1, V Craig Jordan2. 1. Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC (PYM, REM, DJF, PB, VRK, CJ); Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (RFC). 2. Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC (PYM, REM, DJF, PB, VRK, CJ); Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (RFC). vcj2@georgetown.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen is metabolically activated via a CYP2D6 enzyme system to the more potent hydroxylated derivatives 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen. This study addresses the pharmacological importance of endoxifen by simulating clinical scenarios in vitro. METHODS: Clinical levels of tamoxifen metabolites in postmenopausal breast cancer patients previously genotyped for CYP2D6 were used in vitro along with clinical estrogen levels (estrone and estradiol) in postmenopausal patients determined in previous studies. The biological effects on cell growth were evaluated in a panel of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cell lines via cell proliferation assays and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Data were analyzed with one- and two-way analysis of variance and Student's t test. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Postmenopausal levels of estrogen-induced proliferation of all test breast cancer cell lines (mean fold induction ± SD vs vehicle control: MCF-7 = 11 ± 1.74, P < .001; T47D = 7.52 ± 0.72, P < .001; BT474 = 1.75 ± 0.23, P < .001; ZR-75-1 = 5.5 ± 1.95, P = .001. Tamoxifen and primary metabolites completely inhibited cell growth regardless of the CYP2D6 genotype in all cell lines (mean fold induction ± SD vs vehicle control: MCF-7 = 1.57 ± 0.38, P = .54; T47D = 1.17 ± 0.23, P = .79; BT474 = 0.96 ± 0.2, P = .98; ZR-75-1 = 0.86 ± 0.67, P = .99). Interestingly, tamoxifen and its primary metabolites were not able to fully inhibit the estrogen-stimulated expression of estrogen-responsive genes in MCF-7 cells (P < .05 for all genes), but the addition of endoxifen was able to produce additional antiestrogenic effect on these genes. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that tamoxifen and other metabolites, excluding endoxifen, completely inhibit estrogen-stimulated growth in all cell lines, but additional antiestrogenic action from endoxifen is necessary for complete blockade of estrogen-stimulated genes. Endoxifen is of supportive importance for the therapeutic effect of tamoxifen in a postmenopausal setting.
BACKGROUND:Tamoxifen is metabolically activated via a CYP2D6 enzyme system to the more potent hydroxylated derivatives 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen. This study addresses the pharmacological importance of endoxifen by simulating clinical scenarios in vitro. METHODS: Clinical levels of tamoxifen metabolites in postmenopausal breast cancerpatients previously genotyped for CYP2D6 were used in vitro along with clinical estrogen levels (estrone and estradiol) in postmenopausal patients determined in previous studies. The biological effects on cell growth were evaluated in a panel of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cell lines via cell proliferation assays and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Data were analyzed with one- and two-way analysis of variance and Student's t test. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Postmenopausal levels of estrogen-induced proliferation of all test breast cancer cell lines (mean fold induction ± SD vs vehicle control: MCF-7 = 11 ± 1.74, P < .001; T47D = 7.52 ± 0.72, P < .001; BT474 = 1.75 ± 0.23, P < .001; ZR-75-1 = 5.5 ± 1.95, P = .001. Tamoxifen and primary metabolites completely inhibited cell growth regardless of the CYP2D6 genotype in all cell lines (mean fold induction ± SD vs vehicle control: MCF-7 = 1.57 ± 0.38, P = .54; T47D = 1.17 ± 0.23, P = .79; BT474 = 0.96 ± 0.2, P = .98; ZR-75-1 = 0.86 ± 0.67, P = .99). Interestingly, tamoxifen and its primary metabolites were not able to fully inhibit the estrogen-stimulated expression of estrogen-responsive genes in MCF-7 cells (P < .05 for all genes), but the addition of endoxifen was able to produce additional antiestrogenic effect on these genes. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that tamoxifen and other metabolites, excluding endoxifen, completely inhibit estrogen-stimulated growth in all cell lines, but additional antiestrogenic action from endoxifen is necessary for complete blockade of estrogen-stimulated genes. Endoxifen is of supportive importance for the therapeutic effect of tamoxifen in a postmenopausal setting.
Authors: H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2000-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-03-25 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Joan S Lewis-Wambi; Helen Kim; Ramona Curpan; Ronald Grigg; Mohammed A Sarker; V Craig Jordan Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: L Madlensky; L Natarajan; S Tchu; M Pu; J Mortimer; S W Flatt; D M Nikoloff; G Hillman; M R Fontecha; H J Lawrence; B A Parker; A H B Wu; J P Pierce Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: L A Lammers; R H J Mathijssen; T van Gelder; M J Bijl; A-J M de Graan; C Seynaeve; M A van Fessem; E M Berns; A G Vulto; R H N van Schaik Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: A H M de Vries Schultink; X Alexi; E van Werkhoven; L Madlensky; L Natarajan; S W Flatt; W Zwart; S C Linn; B A Parker; A H B Wu; J P Pierce; A D R Huitema; J H Beijnen Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Matthew P Goetz; Katrin Sangkuhl; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Matthias Schwab; Michael Province; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; W Fraser Symmans; Howard L McLeod; Mark J Ratain; Hitoshi Zembutsu; Andrea Gaedigk; Ron H van Schaik; James N Ingle; Kelly E Caudle; Teri E Klein Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Matthew P Goetz; Vera J Suman; Joel M Reid; Don W Northfelt; Michael A Mahr; Andrew T Ralya; Mary Kuffel; Sarah A Buhrow; Stephanie L Safgren; Renee M McGovern; John Black; Travis Dockter; Tufia Haddad; Charles Erlichman; Alex A Adjei; Dan Visscher; Zachary R Chalmers; Garrett Frampton; Benjamin R Kipp; Minetta C Liu; John R Hawse; James H Doroshow; Jerry M Collins; Howard Streicher; Matthew M Ames; James N Ingle Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Milena Rondón-Lagos; Victoria E Villegas; Nelson Rangel; Magda Carolina Sánchez; Peter G Zaphiropoulos Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Kelvin F Cho; Taylur P Ma; Christopher M Rose; Donald S Kirkpatrick; Kebing Yu; Robert A Blake Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 14.919