Literature DB >> 14656904

Evaluation of imprecision for cardiac troponin assays at low-range concentrations.

Mauro Panteghini1, Franca Pagani, Kiang-Teck J Yeo, Fred S Apple, Robert H Christenson, Francesco Dati, Johannes Mair, Jan Ravkilde, Alan H B Wu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction (MI) has recommended that an increased cardiac troponin should be defined as a measurement above the 99th percentile value of the reference group. A total imprecision (CV) at the decision limit of </=10% is recommended. However, peer-reviewed data on assay imprecision are lacking. The purpose of this study was to construct the clinically relevant imprecision profiles for each of the commercially available cardiac troponin assays. Pools of human sera containing cardiac troponin concentrations around the MI decision limit were assessed to identify the lowest concentration associated with a 10% CV.
METHODS: Eight serum pools targeting different concentrations of cardiac troponin (I and T) were prepared and stored at -70 degrees C until usage. The cardiac troponin measurement protocol consisted of two replicates per specimen per run, and one run per day for 20 days, using two reagent lots and three calibrations. Manufacturers of each cardiac troponin assay directly performed the measurements. Data analysis for each assay was centralized and performed according to the NCCLS EP5-A guideline.
RESULTS: The lowest concentrations (microg/L) providing a 10% CV were as follows: AxSYM, 1.22; ACS:180, 0.37; Centaur, 0.33; Immuno 1, 0.34; Access, 0.06; Vidas, 0.36; Liaison, 0.065; Dimension, 0.26; Opus, 0.90; Stratus CS, 0.10; Immulite, 0.32; Vitros ECi, 0.44; Elecsys, 0.04; AIA 21, 0.09.
CONCLUSION: No cardiac troponin assay was able to achieve the 10% CV recommendation at the 99th percentile reference limit defined by the manufacturer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14656904     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.026815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  36 in total

Review 1.  British Cardiac Society Working Group on the definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K A A Fox; J Birkhead; R Wilcox; C Knight; J Barth
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  A review of troponins in ischemic heart disease and other conditions.

Authors:  Nedaa Skeik; Deevia Chandrakant Patel
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2007

3.  Stress myocardial perfusion imaging for the evaluation and triage of chest pain in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Swee Han Lim; Venkataraman Anantharaman; Felix Sundram; Edwin Shih-Yen Chan; Ee Sin Ang; Sui Lan Yo; Edward Jacob; Anthony Goh; Say Beng Tan; Terrance Chua
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Surveillance and prevention of major perioperative ischemic cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a review.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Lee Goldman; Salim Yusuf; Ken Gilbert; Kate Leslie; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Traceability, reference systems and result comparability.

Authors:  Mauro Panteghini
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2007-08

Review 6.  [Biomarkers in cardiology--state of the art 2007].

Authors:  Johannes Mair
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007-02

7.  Detection of acute changes in circulating troponin in the setting of transient stress test-induced myocardial ischaemia using an ultrasensitive assay: results from TIMI 35.

Authors:  Marc S Sabatine; David A Morrow; James A de Lemos; Petr Jarolim; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Point-of-care fluorescence immunoassay for cardiac panel biomarkers.

Authors:  Tae Kyum Kim; Sang Wook Oh; Soon Cheol Hong; Young Joon Mok; Eui Yul Choi
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.352

9.  The future of laboratory medicine: understanding the new pressures.

Authors:  Mauro Panteghini
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2004

10.  The new definition of myocardial infarction--can we use it?

Authors:  Stefan Agewall; Christian Löwbeer
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.