Literature DB >> 14656182

Frequency, predictive factors, and consequences of stent-graft kink following endovascular AAA repair.

Gerdine A J Fransen1, Pascal Desgranges, Robert J F Laheij, Peter L Harris, Jean-Pierre Becquemin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine from the EUROSTAR registry the incidence of stent-graft kink, predictive factors for kinking, and the consequences of this complication on graft patency and aneurysm exclusion.
METHODS: From January 1994 to June 2002, 4613 patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair were registered in the EUROSTAR registry. Presence of kink was determined according to the information available on the follow-up Case Record Form. The population was divided into those with and without stent-graft kink. Patient characteristics, morphological aneurysm features, team experience, type of device, period of implantation, and outcome were compared between the groups by univariate analysis. Significant factors were subsequently submitted to a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy (3.7%) patients were reported as having a kink of the stent-graft during a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 1-72). Gender, neck angulation, team experience, period of implantation, ASA classification, and device type were independent predictors of kink. The presence of a kink was significantly associated with type I endoleaks (proximal and distal), type III endoleaks (midgraft), graft stenosis, graft limb thrombosis, graft migration, and conversion to open repair. No relationship was found between a decrease in the aneurysm diameter and the occurrence of stent-graft kink.
CONCLUSIONS: Kinks of stent-grafts were infrequent events in the intermediate term. Patients most at risk were women with angulated aortic necks treated by a minimally experienced team. Kinks are potentially damaging events because they may lead to delayed device-related endoleaks, graft stenosis, thrombosis, and conversion to open repair. They appear more closely associated to graft migration than to aneurysm diameter reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14656182     DOI: 10.1177/152660280301000511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  7 in total

Review 1.  Complications of endovascular aneurysm repair of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: evaluation and management.

Authors:  Dania Daye; T Gregory Walker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

Review 2.  Duplex Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography for the Postoperative Follow-Up of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Where Do We Stand Now?

Authors:  Evridiki Karanikola; Ilias Dalainas; Georgios Karaolanis; Georgios Zografos; Konstantinos Filis
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-09

3.  [Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: 6 years of experience at a single centre].

Authors:  R Fossaceca; G Guzzardi; P Cerini; M Di Terlizzi; E Malatesta; L Filice; P Brustia; A Carriero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  A Case of Endovascular Treatment of Severe Graft Limb Kinking after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Jong-Beom Shin; Mi-Hwa Park; Sang-Ho Jeong; Sung Woo Kwon; Sung-Hee Shin; Seong-Ill Woo; Sang-Don Park
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2016-03-31

5.  Comparison of Outcomes in Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair vs Open Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Konrad Salata; Mohamad A Hussain; Charles de Mestral; Elisa Greco; Badr A Aljabri; Muhammad Mamdani; Thomas L Forbes; Deepak L Bhatt; Subodh Verma; Mohammed Al-Omran
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-07-03

Review 6.  Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Hyoung Ook Kim; Nam Yeol Yim; Jae Kyu Kim; Yang Jun Kang; Byung Chan Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 7.  CT angiography for the assessment of EVAR complications: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Cecilia Gozzo; Giovanni Caruana; Roberto Cannella; Arduino Farina; Dario Giambelluca; Ettore Dinoto; Federica Vernuccio; Antonio Basile; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-01-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.