Literature DB >> 23184247

[Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: 6 years of experience at a single centre].

R Fossaceca1, G Guzzardi, P Cerini, M Di Terlizzi, E Malatesta, L Filice, P Brustia, A Carriero.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to assess the effectiveness of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR) through a retrospective review of 6 years' experience at a single centre.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2005 to August 2011, 222 patients affected by abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent EVAR. We evaluated primary technical success, postprocedural mortality, intraprocedural and postprocedural complications with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) follow-up at 1, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter.
RESULTS: The procedures were elective in 75.7% and urgent due to symptomatic or ruptured aneurysm in 24.3%. Technical success was 98.6%; three patients (1.4%) required conversion to open surgery. Postoperative mortality rate was 24% for urgent and 2.3% for elective procedures. During a mean follow-up period of 29.6 months, no cases of stent-graft migration were observed; the overall incidence of endoleaks was 27% (60/222) and comprised four type I (1.8%) and one type III (0.45%), all treated by stent-graft extension, and 55 type 2 (24.8%), eight of which (14.5%) were treated by percutaneous injection of thrombin. In 10/222 cases (4.5%), thrombotic occlusion of the iliac extension was detected, which was successfully treated by transcatheter intra-arterial thrombolysis. One patient developed stent-graft infection requiring surgical explantation. Average hospital stay was 4 days, and average time in intensive care was 2 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the literature data, our study confirms the safety and long-term efficacy of EVAR for treating AAA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23184247     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-012-0905-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  43 in total

Review 1.  Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery.

Authors:  F L Moll; J T Powell; G Fraedrich; F Verzini; S Haulon; M Waltham; J A van Herwaarden; P J E Holt; J W van Keulen; B Rantner; F J V Schlösser; F Setacci; J-B Ricco
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.069

2.  Translumbar type II endoleak repair using angiographic CT.

Authors:  Christoph A Binkert; Herlen Alencar; Jai Singh; Richard A Baum
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Preoperative sizing of grafts for transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management: a prospective comparative study of spiral CT angiography, arteriography, and conventional CT imaging.

Authors:  I A Broeders; J D Blankensteijn; M Olree; W Mali; B C Eikelboom
Journal:  J Endovasc Surg       Date:  1997-08

4.  Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Jan D Blankensteijn; Sjors E C A de Jong; Monique Prinssen; Arie C van der Ham; Jaap Buth; Steven M M van Sterkenburg; Hence J M Verhagen; Erik Buskens; Diederick E Grobbee
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Monique Prinssen; Eric L G Verhoeven; Jaap Buth; Philippe W M Cuypers; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Ron Balm; Erik Buskens; Diederick E Grobbee; Jan D Blankensteijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm with aortocaval fistula.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guzzardi; Rita Fossaceca; Ignazio Divenuto; Antonello Musiani; Piero Brustia; Alessandro Carriero
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 7.  Type II endoleaks: when is intervention indicated and what is the index of suspicion for types I or III?

Authors:  Michael M M D Lawrence-Brown; Zhonghua Sun; James B Semmens; Kurt Liffman; Ilija D Sutalo; David B Hartley
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective.

Authors:  Eric Steinmetz; Brian G Rubin; Luis A Sanchez; Eric T Choi; Patrick J Geraghty; Jack Baty; Robert W Thompson; M Wayne Flye; David M Hovsepian; Daniel Picus; Gregorio A Sicard
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm and outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair: does size matter? A report from EUROSTAR.

Authors:  Noud Peppelenbosch; Jacob Buth; Peter L Harris; Corine van Marrewijk; Gerdine Fransen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Effect of endovascular aneurysm repair on the volume-outcome relationship in aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Peter J E Holt; Jan D Poloniecki; Usman Khalid; Robert J Hinchliffe; Ian M Loftus; Matt M Thompson
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-09-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  Are abdominal aortic aneurysms with hostile neck really unsuitable for EVAR? Our experience.

Authors:  Paolo Cerini; Giuseppe Guzzardi; Ignazio Divenuto; Giuseppe Parziale; Piero Brustia; Alessandro Carriero; Rita Fossaceca
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.469

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.