Literature DB >> 16733705

Differential effects of advance semantic cues on grasping, naming, and manual estimation.

Grzegorz Króliczak1, David A Westwood, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

In the three experiments reported here, we systematically investigated when and/or how prior semantic information about a target-object would affect the programming and execution of grasping movements. A name-length association was first created during a practice phase while participants performed one of the three tasks: grasping, naming, or manual estimation of an object's length upon an auditory presentation of its name. In the subsequent test phase, in the majority of trials, these names correctly indicated the upcoming object for a grasping task or a control naming task (Experiment 1A and 1B), and a grasping task or a manual estimation of object length (Experiment 2). In both experiments, a name was occasionally incongruent or a neutral cue (a burst of white noise) was presented instead. Although in the grasping task, semantic cues (both congruent and incongruent) consistently facilitated movement-onset time (indicating a preparatory-set like effect), the impact of these cues on the formation of grasping aperture was less consistent or absent. The experiments also demonstrated that naming and perceptual estimation of object length were affected differently from grasping by the same semantic cues, with the congruent cues facilitating and the incongruent cues slowing down response onset. These findings reinforce and extend the proposal that the transformations of visual and semantic information for perceptually-driven tasks are quite different from the transformations of the same information for the programming and control of object-directed action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16733705     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0524-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Planning of reach-and-grasp movements: effects of validity and type of object information.

Authors:  L D Loukopoulos; S F Engelbrecht; N E Berthier
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Language and motor control.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; F Benuzzi; L Bertolani; E Daprati; M Gangitano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Richard A Andersen; Christopher A Buneo
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Learning new names for new objects: cortical effects as measured by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Katri Cornelissen; Matti Laine; Kati Renvall; Timo Saarinen; Nadine Martin; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion.

Authors:  M Jeannerod; J Decety; F Michel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Saccadic programming and perceived location.

Authors:  E Wong; A Mack
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1981-08

10.  No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually guided action task.

Authors:  Jonathan S Cant; David A Westwood; Kenneth F Valyear; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  9 in total

1.  Haptically Guided Grasping. fMRI Shows Right-Hemisphere Parietal Stimulus Encoding, and Bilateral Dorso-Ventral Parietal Gradients of Object- and Action-Related Processing during Grasp Execution.

Authors:  Mattia Marangon; Agnieszka Kubiak; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Effect of weight-related labels on corticospinal excitability during observation of grasping: a TMS study.

Authors:  Patrice Senot; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Michele Franca; Luana Caselli; Laila Craighero; Luciano Fadiga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools.

Authors:  Kenneth F Valyear; Craig S Chapman; Jason P Gallivan; Robert S Mark; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual control of action directed toward two-dimensional objects relies on holistic processing of object shape.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

5.  Complex tools and motor-to-mechanical transformations.

Authors:  M Ras; M Wyrwa; J Stachowiak; M Buchwald; A M Nowik; G Kroliczak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  A comparison of item response theory-based methods for examining differential item functioning in object naming test by language of assessment among older Latinos.

Authors:  Frances M Yang; Kevin C Heslin; Kala M Mehta; Cheng-Wu Yang; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Marjorie Kleinman; Leo S Morales; Ron D Hays; Anita L Stewart; Dan Mungas; Richard N Jones; Jeanne A Teresi
Journal:  Psychol Test Assess Model       Date:  2011

7.  Sinistrals are rarely "right": evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms.

Authors:  Bartosz Michałowski; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The effects of visual half-field priming on the categorization of familiar intransitive gestures, tool use pantomimes, and meaningless hand movements.

Authors:  Honorata Helon; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-27

9.  The Size Congruity Effect Vanishes in Grasping: Implications for the Processing of Numerical Information.

Authors:  Gal Namdar; Tzvi Ganel; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.