Literature DB >> 14648225

The ideomotor principle and motor sequence acquisition: tone effects facilitate movement chunking.

Christian Stöcker1, Joachim Hoffmann.   

Abstract

Participants practiced short sequences of key presses; sequence length and response-effect mapping were the independent variables. Contingent, distinct key-effect relations were contrasted with either contingent but uniform or no response effects. In Experiment 1, tone effects were relevant as response-specific stimuli and also as effects. The sequence length effect for the tones group was reduced. In Experiment 2, participants were informed about the sequences to be executed and then given varying amounts of preparation time before the start signal. A reduction in the sequence length effect was observed, and initiation times and mean interresponse time (IRTs) were generally reduced in the tone group. Preparation time could compensate for some but not all of the latency reducing influence of the tone effects. The results are discussed with reference to ideomotor approaches to motor control, i.e., the notion that actions are represented in sensory format. Copyright 2003 Springer-Verlag

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14648225     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0150-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  7 in total

1.  Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks.

Authors:  J Hoffmann; A Sebald; C Stöcker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task.

Authors:  M Ziessler; D Nattkemper
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks.

Authors:  W Kunde
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The influence of response--effect compatibility in a serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Christian Stöcker; Albrecht Sebald; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-05

5.  Temporal response-effect compatibility.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-25

6.  Effect anticipation and action control.

Authors:  B Elsner; B Hommel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism.

Authors:  A G Greenwald
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 8.934

  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  Multilevel coordination stability: integrated goal representations in simultaneous intra-personal and inter-agent coordination.

Authors:  Peter E Keller; Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-05-19

2.  Action-effects enhance explicit sequential learning.

Authors:  Sarah Esser; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-16

Review 3.  A goal-based mechanism for delayed motor intention: considerations from motor skills, tool use and action memory.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; François Osiurak
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-10

4.  Effector-related sequence learning in a bimanual-bisequential serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Michael P Berner; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-11-08

5.  Sleep-dependent learning and motor-skill complexity.

Authors:  Kenichi Kuriyama; Robert Stickgold; Matthew P Walker
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 6.  Prospective coding in event representation.

Authors:  Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-04-04

7.  Contributions to a neurophysiology of meaning: the interpretation of written messages could be an automatic stimulus-reaction mechanism before becoming conscious processing of information.

Authors:  Roberto Maffei; Livia S Convertini; Sabrina Quatraro; Stefania Ressa; Annalisa Velasco
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Multisensory action effects facilitate the performance of motor sequences.

Authors:  Mengkai Luan; Heiko Maurer; Arash Mirifar; Jürgen Beckmann; Felix Ehrlenspiel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Practice makes imperfect: restorative effects of sleep on motor learning.

Authors:  Bhavin R Sheth; Davit Janvelyan; Murtuza Khan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transfer in Motor Sequence Learning: Effects of Practice Schedule and Sequence Context.

Authors:  Diana M Müssgens; Fredrik Ullén
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.