Literature DB >> 11294444

Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks.

J Hoffmann1, A Sebald, C Stöcker.   

Abstract

Tones were introduced into a serial reaction time (SRT) task to serve as redundant response effects. Experiment 1 showed that the tones improved serial learning with a 10-element stimulus sequence, but only if the tone effects were mapped onto the responses contingently. Experiment 2 demonstrated that switching to noncontingent response-effect mapping increased SRT only when participants had previously adapted to contingent response-effect mapping. In Experiment 3, the beneficial influence of contingent tone effects on serial learning occurred only when there was sufficient time between the response effects and the next imperative stimuli. The results are discussed in terms of the ideomotor principle. It is claimed that an internal representation of the to-be-produced tone effects develops and gains control over the execution of the response sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11294444     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  28 in total

1.  A short history of ideo-motor action.

Authors:  Armin Stock; Claudia Stock
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-18

2.  Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning.

Authors:  Birgit Elsner; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-18

3.  Temporal response-effect compatibility.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-25

4.  Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: evidence for the primacy of response predictions.

Authors:  Joachim Hoffmann; Claudia Martin; Annette Schilling
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-08

5.  Variable action effects: response control by context-specific effect anticipations.

Authors:  Andrea Kiesel; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-11-01

6.  Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning.

Authors:  O V Lungu; T Wächter; T Liu; D T Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effector dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-07-03

8.  Correlation and response relevance in sequence learning.

Authors:  Josephine Cock; Beat Meier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07-06

9.  Learning at any rate: action-effect learning for stimulus-based actions.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Andrea Kiesel; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-05-19

10.  Crossmodal encoding of motor sequence memories.

Authors:  Marianne A Stephan; Brittany Heckel; Sunbin Song; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.