| Literature DB >> 33135098 |
Mengkai Luan1, Heiko Maurer2, Arash Mirifar3, Jürgen Beckmann3,4, Felix Ehrlenspiel3.
Abstract
Research has shown that contingent, distinct action effects have a beneficial influence on motor sequence performance. Previous studies showed the beneficial influence of task-irrelevant action effects from one modality (auditory) on motor sequence performance, compared with no task-irrelevant action effects. The present study investigated the influence of task-irrelevant action effects on motor sequence performance from a multiple-modality perspective. We compared motor sequence performances of participants who received different task-irrelevant action effects in an auditory, visual, or audiovisual condition. In the auditory condition, key presses produced tones of a C-major scale that mapped to keys from left to right in ascending order. In the visual condition, key presses produced rectangles in different locations on the screen that mapped to keys from left to right in ascending order. In the audiovisual condition, both tone and rectangle effects were produced simultaneously by key presses. There were advantages for the audiovisual group in motor sequence initiation and execution. The results implied that, compared with unimodal action effects, action effects from multiple sensory modalities can prime an action faster and strengthen associations between successive actions, leading to faster motor sequence performance.Entities:
Keywords: Action effect; Motor sequence; Multisensory; The ideomotor principle
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33135098 PMCID: PMC7875850 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02179-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Atten Percept Psychophys ISSN: 1943-3921 Impact factor: 2.199