Literature DB >> 33135098

Multisensory action effects facilitate the performance of motor sequences.

Mengkai Luan1, Heiko Maurer2, Arash Mirifar3, Jürgen Beckmann3,4, Felix Ehrlenspiel3.   

Abstract

Research has shown that contingent, distinct action effects have a beneficial influence on motor sequence performance. Previous studies showed the beneficial influence of task-irrelevant action effects from one modality (auditory) on motor sequence performance, compared with no task-irrelevant action effects. The present study investigated the influence of task-irrelevant action effects on motor sequence performance from a multiple-modality perspective. We compared motor sequence performances of participants who received different task-irrelevant action effects in an auditory, visual, or audiovisual condition. In the auditory condition, key presses produced tones of a C-major scale that mapped to keys from left to right in ascending order. In the visual condition, key presses produced rectangles in different locations on the screen that mapped to keys from left to right in ascending order. In the audiovisual condition, both tone and rectangle effects were produced simultaneously by key presses. There were advantages for the audiovisual group in motor sequence initiation and execution. The results implied that, compared with unimodal action effects, action effects from multiple sensory modalities can prime an action faster and strengthen associations between successive actions, leading to faster motor sequence performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action effect; Motor sequence; Multisensory; The ideomotor principle

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33135098      PMCID: PMC7875850          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02179-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  32 in total

1.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.

Authors:  D H RAAB
Journal:  Trans N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1962-03

3.  Intra- and intermodal integration of discrepant visual and proprioceptive action effects.

Authors:  Stefan Ladwig; Christine Sutter; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The cognitive representation of action: automatic integration of perceived action effects.

Authors:  B Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1996

5.  Action-effects enhance explicit sequential learning.

Authors:  Sarah Esser; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-16

Review 6.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

7.  Response-effects trigger the development of explicit knowledge.

Authors:  Clarissa Lustig; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2019-02-26

8.  The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; Stephanie McHughen; Steven C Cramer; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding).

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-04-01

10.  Intermodal event files: integrating features across vision, audition, taction, and action.

Authors:  Sharon Zmigrod; Michiel Spapé; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-03
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Reach-to-Grasp: A Multisensory Experience.

Authors:  Sonia Betti; Umberto Castiello; Chiara Begliomini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.