Literature DB >> 14647988

FDG-PET/CT in re-staging of patients with lymphoma.

L S Freudenberg1, G Antoch, P Schütt, T Beyer, W Jentzen, S P Müller, R Görges, M R Nowrousian, A Bockisch, J F Debatin.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of combined fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients with lymphoma, and to compare the FDG-PET/CT staging results with those of FDG-PET and CT alone. Twenty-seven patients were studied. Each patient had clinical follow-up for >12 months and entered complete follow-up evaluation. Patient-based evaluation showed a sensitivity of 78% for CT alone, 86% for FDG-PET alone, 93% for CT and FDG-PET read side by side, and 93% for combined FDG-PET/CT imaging. Region-based evaluation showed a sensitivity for regional lymph node involvement of 61%, 78%, 91% and 96% respectively. FDG-PET/CT imaging is superior to CT alone ( P=0.02) and has additional benefit over FDG-PET alone due to exact anatomical localisation. We conclude that FDG-PET/CT imaging is accurate in re-staging lymphoma and offers advantages over separate FDG-PET and CT imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14647988     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1375-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  25 in total

1.  Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Gerald Antoch; Todd Blodgett; Lutz F Freudenberg; Tim Akhurst; Stephan Mueller
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Prognostic value of pretransplantation positron emission tomography using fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Karoline Spaepen; Sigrid Stroobants; Patrick Dupont; Peter Vandenberghe; Johan Maertens; Guy Bormans; José Thomas; Jan Balzarini; Christine De Wolf-Peeters; Luc Mortelmans; Gregor Verhoef
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value.

Authors:  S C Huang
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Morton Coleman; John P Leonard; Ichiei Kuji; Holly Zoe; Stanley J Goldsmith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Dual-modality PET/CT tomography for clinical oncology.

Authors:  T Beyer; D W Townsend; T M Blodgett
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-03

Review 6.  The lymphomas.

Authors:  V T DeVita; G P Canellos
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.851

7.  Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner.

Authors:  M Charron; T Beyer; N N Bohnen; P E Kinahan; M Dachille; J Jerin; R Nutt; C C Meltzer; V Villemagne; D W Townsend
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.794

8.  Evaluation of tumour metabolism and multidrug resistance in patients with treated malignant lymphomas.

Authors:  A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; L G Strauss; H Goldschmidt; W J Lorenz; W Maier-Borst; G van Kaick
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-05

9.  Computed tomography of abdominal paraaortic lymph node disease: preliminary observations with a 6 second scanner.

Authors:  W H Marshall; R S Breiman; G S Harell; E Glatstein; H S Kaplan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Early restaging positron emission tomography with ( 18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  K Spaepen; S Stroobants; P Dupont; P Vandenberghe; J Thomas; T de Groot; J Balzarini; C De Wolf-Peeters; L Mortelmans; G Verhoef
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  54 in total

1.  Side-by-side reading of PET and CT scans in oncology: which patients might profit from integrated PET/CT?

Authors:  Patrick Reinartz; Franz-Josef Wieres; Wolfram Schneider; Alexander Schur; Ulrich Buell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  PET in lymphoma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

3.  Comparison of integrated whole-body [11C]choline PET/MR with PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael Souvatzoglou; Matthias Eiber; Toshiki Takei; Sebastian Fürst; Tobias Maurer; Florian Gaertner; Hans Geinitz; Alexander Drzezga; Sibylle Ziegler; Stephan G Nekolla; Ernst J Rummeny; Markus Schwaiger; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Prognostic value of Waldeyer's ring involvement of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP.

Authors:  Min-Young Oh; Joo-Seop Chung; Moo-Kon Song; Ho-Jin Shin; Ho-Sup Lee; Sang-Min Lee; Gyeong-Won Lee; Su-Ee Lee
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.490

5.  Prognostic value of metabolic tumour volume on baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT in addition to NCCN-IPI in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: further stratification of the group with a high-risk NCCN-IPI.

Authors:  Qaid Ahmed Shagera; Gi Jeong Cheon; Youngil Koh; Min Young Yoo; Keon Wook Kang; Dong Soo Lee; E Edmund Kim; Sung-Soo Yoon; June-Key Chung
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Chemotherapy Response Assessment by FDG-PET-CT in Early-stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Moving Beyond the Five-Point Deauville Score.

Authors:  Sarah A Milgrom; Wenli Dong; Mani Akhtari; Grace L Smith; Chelsea C Pinnix; Osama Mawlawi; Eric Rohren; Naveen Garg; Hubert Chuang; Zeinab Abou Yehia; Jay P Reddy; Jillian R Gunther; Joseph D Khoury; Tina Suki; Eleanor M Osborne; Yasuhiro Oki; Michelle Fanale; Bouthaina S Dabaja
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  The early use of PET-CT alters the management of patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  R N Williams; S S Ubhi; C D Sutton; A L Thomas; J J Entwisle; D J Bowrey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The utility of body FDG PET in staging primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Authors:  Nimish A Mohile; Lisa M Deangelis; Lauren E Abrey
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Forced diuresis and dual-phase F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT scan for restaging of urinary bladder cancers.

Authors:  S Harkirat; Ss Anand; Mj Jacob
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2010-02

Review 10.  PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard?

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.