Literature DB >> 12163626

PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease.

Lale Kostakoglu1, Morton Coleman, John P Leonard, Ichiei Kuji, Holly Zoe, Stanley J Goldsmith.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Early identification of chemotherapy-refractory lymphoma patients provides a basis for alternative treatment strategies. Metabolic imaging with (18)F-FDG PET offers functional tissue characterization that is useful for assessing response to therapy. Our objective was to determine the predictive value of (18)F-FDG PET early during chemotherapy (after 1 cycle) and at the completion of chemotherapy for subsequent progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD).
METHODS: (18)F-FDG PET (dual-head coincidence camera with attenuation correction) was performed before and after 1 cycle of chemotherapy on 30 patients (17 NHL, 13 HD; mean age, 52.3 +/- 16.0 y). For 23 of the 30 patients, (18)F-FDG PET data were also obtained after the completion of chemotherapy. The patients had a median follow-up of 19 mo (range, 18-24 mo). Follow-up of PFS was compared between patients with positive and negative (18)F-FDG PET results obtained after the first cycle of chemotherapy and at the completion of chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Positive (18)F-FDG PET results obtained both after the first cycle and at the completion of therapy were associated with a shorter PFS (median, 5 and 0 mo, respectively) than were negative (18)F-FDG PET results (PFS medians not reached). A statistically significant difference in PFS between positive and negative (18)F-FDG PET results was obtained both after the first cycle and at the completion of chemotherapy (P < or = 0.001). The PFS and (18)F-FDG PET results obtained after the first cycle correlated better than those obtained after the completion of chemotherapy (r(2) = 0.45 vs. 0.17). (18)F-FDG PET had more false-negative results after the last cycle (6/17 cases, or 35%) than after the first cycle (2/13 cases, or 15%). Thus, (18)F-FDG PET had greater sensitivity and positive predictive values after the first cycle (82% vs. 45.5% and 90% vs. 83%, respectively) than after the last cycle.
CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET after 1 cycle of chemotherapy is predictive of 18-mo outcome in patients with aggressive NHL and HD and may earlier identify patients who would benefit from more intensive treatment programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12163626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  75 in total

1.  The evolving role of F-FDG PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Peter J Hosein; Izidore S Lossos
Journal:  European J Clin Med Oncol       Date:  2010-02

Review 2.  Prognostic factors in pediatric Hodgkin disease.

Authors:  Cindy L Schwartz
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Has PET become an important clinical tool in paediatric imaging?

Authors:  Klaus Hahn; Thomas Pfluger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Early treatment response evaluation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma--a pilot study comparing volumetric MRI and PET/CT.

Authors:  Xingchen Wu; Prasun Dastidar; Hannu Pertovaara; Pasi Korkola; Ritva Järvenpää; Maija Rossi; Tiit Kööbi; Hannu Eskola; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Personalized versus evidence-based medicine with PET-based imaging.

Authors:  Sandip Basu
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Early interim PET scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: can there be consensus about standardized reporting, and can PET scans guide therapy choices?

Authors:  Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Michel Meignan; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Emmanuel Itti; Damien Huglo; Corinne Haioun; Franck Morschhauser
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 7.  PET in lymphoma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 8.  Biological imaging for selecting and monitoring cancer therapy; a pathway to individualised therapy.

Authors:  Markus Schwaiger; Christian Peschel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Bone involvement in patients with lymphoma: the role of FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Niklaus G Schaefer; Klaus Strobel; Christian Taverna; Thomas F Hany
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Metabolic regulation of cancer cell side population by glucose through activation of the Akt pathway.

Authors:  P-P Liu; J Liao; Z-J Tang; W-J Wu; J Yang; Z-L Zeng; Y Hu; P Wang; H-Q Ju; R-H Xu; P Huang
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 15.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.