Literature DB >> 1464785

A benefit-to-cost analysis of a work-site health promotion program.

T Golaszewski1, D Snow, W Lynch, L Yen, D Solomita.   

Abstract

An analysis of the benefit-to-cost ratio of a major health promotion program was conducted for the years 1986 through 1990, with projections to the year 2000. Program costs for personnel, capital expenses, materials, and rent were determined and compared with program benefits (discounted to account for increasing pension liability) for heath care cost savings, increased productivity, decreased absenteeism, decreased life insurance claims, and program-generated income. After adjusting future monies to net present value, a benefit-to-cost ratio of 3.4 was estimated for the program. Despite the limitations of the study design, the authors concluded that the program realizes a positive return on its investment. Several program recommendations are presented to increase the probability of achieving positive benefit-to-cost ratios in future program offerings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1464785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Med        ISSN: 0096-1736


  6 in total

1.  Reducing need and demand for medical services in high-risk persons. A health education approach.

Authors:  J F Fries; D McShane
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-10

2.  Enhancing community capacity to support physical activity: the development of a community-based indoor-outdoor walking program.

Authors:  Mary Riley-Jacome; Mary P Gallant; Brian D Fisher; Frances S Gotcsik; David S Strogatz
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2010-04

Review 3.  A Scoping Review of Economic Evaluations of Workplace Wellness Programs.

Authors:  Nilay Unsal; GracieLee Weaver; Jeremy Bray; Daniel Bibeau
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  The development of a new corporate specific health risk measurement instrument, and its use in investigating the relationship between health and well-being and employee productivity.

Authors:  Peter R Mills
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  A study of indoor carbon dioxide levels and sick leave among office workers.

Authors:  Theodore A Myatt; John Staudenmayer; Kate Adams; Michael Walters; Stephen N Rudnick; Donald K Milton
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2002-10-22       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  The protocol for the Families First Edmonton trial (FFE): a randomized community-based trial to compare four service integration approaches for families with low-income.

Authors:  Jane Drummond; Laurie Schnirer; Sylvia So; Maria Mayan; Deanna L Williamson; Jeffrey Bisanz; Konrad Fassbender; Natasha Wiebe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.