Literature DB >> 14646744

Patellar options in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Cecil H Rorabeck1, Ramin Mehin, Robert L Barrack.   

Abstract

There are numerous options that need to be considered by the surgeon at the time of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One needs to consider the reason for the revision, the type of patella in place, and the length of time the patella has been in place. The surgeon also needs to consider the status of the patellar bone stock, the stability of the patellar component (well-fixed or loose), and the component type (cemented or metal-backed). Assuming that the existing prosthesis is not metal-backed and has minimal PE wear, then it is preferable to retain a well-fixed all-PE cemented patellar button. However, if the button is metal-backed, then it probably is best to remove the button and replace it with an all-PE domed patellar component. Assuming more than 8 mm of patellar bone stock is remaining, it usually is best to cement an all-PE dome-shaped patella. However, if less than 8 mm is remaining, then that patient can be left with a patelloplasty, recognizing that this individual is going to continue with a high likelihood of anterior knee pain, subluxation, and poor functional results. In that situation, it may be preferable to consider a bone stock augmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14646744     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000092982.12414.a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Patellar bone deficiency in revision total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  J Kloiber; E Goldenitsch; P Ritschl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Achilles tendon allograft for augmentation of the Hanssen patellar bone grafting.

Authors:  Friedrich Boettner; Jad Bou Monsef
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  What Is the Role for Patelloplasty With Gullwing Osteotomy in Revision TKA?

Authors:  Jeremy M Gililland; Presley Swann; Christopher E Pelt; Jill Erickson; Nadia Hamad; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Management of the deficient patella in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan M Garcia; Matthew J Kraay; Patricia A Conroy-Smith; Victor M Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Augmentation with transcortical wiring of an onlay-type prosthesis for a deficient patella during revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jai-Gon Seo; Young-Wan Moon; Seung-Jae Lim; Ji-Soon Lim; Sang-Min Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-05-17

6.  Fracture of an uncemented tantalum patellar component.

Authors:  Nathan L Grimm; Robert A Henderson; Joseph J Kavolus; Patrick D Millikan; Paul F Lachiewicz
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-02-26

7.  Screw and cement augmentation of patella defects in knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  N Jayasekera; A Lakdawala; A D Toms; K S Eyres
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  A classification-based approach to the patella in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew W Tetreault; Christopher E Gross; Paul H Yi; Daniel D Bohl; Scott M Sporer; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.