Literature DB >> 24417840

Screw and cement augmentation of patella defects in knee arthroplasty.

N Jayasekera1, A Lakdawala, A D Toms, K S Eyres.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24417840      PMCID: PMC5137668          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2014.96.1.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


× No keyword cloud information.

BACKGROUND

At primary and revision knee arthroplasty, a deficient patella with a contained or uncontained defect is often encountered,[1,2] especially in the presence of longstanding maltracking. In these cases, reconstruction is difficult, leaving an unsupported implant. Following the good outcomes achieved using cement fixation of large defects of the tibial plateau augmented with screws, we describe a technique to address patella defects in cases where patella tracking is a problem and would compromise the final result.

TECHNIQUE

After conservative bone resection of the patella, the residual defect can be assessed and augmented by screws using a 2.5mm drill to secure a desired number (one to four) of standard 3.5mm cortical screws in the defect. These are orientated to provide maximum support and also to enable placement of the patella trial component (Figs 1 and 2). The patella component is then cemented with the screw used as a scaffold to augment fixation to the bone (Figs 3 and 4).
Figure 1

Clinical photograph of prepared patella with uncontained defect

Figure 2

Clinical photograph of screw placement and patella trial component

Figure 3

Clinical photograph of cemented patella component with screw augmentation

Figure 4

Radiography of the reconstructed patella at five-year follow-up appointment

Clinical photograph of prepared patella with uncontained defect Clinical photograph of screw placement and patella trial component Clinical photograph of cemented patella component with screw augmentation Radiography of the reconstructed patella at five-year follow-up appointment

DISCUSSION

In cases where the surgeon would prefer to resurface a deficient patella because the option of retaining the host would lead to maltracking, we have found this technique to be reliable, versatile and cheap to overcome the otherwise complicated scenario of patella deficiency. It avoids the risk of fracture by reducing the amount of bone that would otherwise be resected for a traditional fixation, and obviates the need for more cumbersome and expensive augmented patella implants, which have a poor track record.[4,5]

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

ADT receives personal research and department support from Stryker, Smith & Nephew and Corin.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Patellar options in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cecil H Rorabeck; Ramin Mehin; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Medial screws and cement: a possible mechanical augmentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Merrill A Ritter; Leesa D Harty
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Porous tantalum patellar augmentation: the importance of residual bone stock.

Authors:  Michael D Ries; Adam Cabalo; Kevin J Bozic; Martin Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Screw and cement fixation of large defects in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M A Ritter
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Revision and salvage patellar arthroplasty using a porous tantalum implant.

Authors:  Sam Nasser; Robert A Poggie
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.757

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.