Literature DB >> 14645950

The Australian tar derby: the origins and fate of a low tar harm reduction programme.

W King1, S M Carter, R Borland, S Chapman, N Gray.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document the development of the low tar harm reduction programme in Australia, including tobacco industry responses. DATA SOURCES: Tobacco industry documents, retail tobacco journals, newspapers, medical journals, and Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria (ACCV) newsletters and archival records. STUDY SELECTION: Documents on the strategies and knowledge bases of the ACCV, other Australian health authorities, and the tobacco industry.
RESULTS: The ACCV built a durable system for measuring and publicising the tar and nicotine yields of Australian cigarettes and influencing their development. The tobacco industry initially sought to block the development of this system but later appeared to cooperate with it, as is evidenced by the current market dominance of low tar brands. However, behind the scenes, the industry used its substantial knowledge advantage regarding compensatory smoking and its ability to re-engineer cigarettes to gain effective control of the system and subvert the ACCV's objectives.
CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of the low tar programme with new means of minimising the harms from cigarette smoking should be a policy priority for the Australian government. This will require regulation, rather than further voluntary agreements, and stringent monitoring of successor programmes will be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14645950      PMCID: PMC1766122          DOI: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  8 in total

1.  Reflections on the saga of tar content: why did we measure the wrong thing?

Authors:  N Gray
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Smokers' beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes.

Authors:  S Shiffman; J L Pillitteri; S L Burton; J M Rohay; J G Gitchell
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  More on the regulation of tobacco smoke: how we got here and where next.

Authors:  N Gray; L T Kozlowski
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Low-tar cigarettes: bane or benefit.

Authors:  N Gray
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1987

Review 6.  The changing cigarette.

Authors:  D Hoffmann; M V Djordjevic; I Hoffmann
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Nicotine regulates smoking patterns.

Authors:  M V Djordjevic; D Hoffmann; I Hoffmann
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Self-regulation of smoking intensity. Smoke yields of the low-nicotine, low-'tar' cigarettes.

Authors:  M V Djordjevic; J Fan; S Ferguson; D Hoffmann
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.944

  8 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Tobacco industry consumer research on socially acceptable cigarettes.

Authors:  P M Ling; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Research required for the effective implementation of the framework convention on tobacco control, articles 9 and 10.

Authors:  Nigel Gray; Ron Borland
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 3.  Toward a comprehensive long term nicotine policy.

Authors:  N Gray; J E Henningfield; N L Benowitz; G N Connolly; C Dresler; K Fagerstrom; M J Jarvis; P Boyle
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  The decline of menthol cigarette smoking in Australia, 1980-2008.

Authors:  Bill King; Victoria White; James Balmford; Jae Cooper; Ron Borland
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 5.  Implications of the federal court order banning the terms "light" and "mild": what difference could it make?

Authors:  Stacey J Anderson; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  The Australian cigarette brand as product, person, and symbol.

Authors:  S M Carter
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Smokers' awareness of filter ventilation, and how they believe it affects them: findings from the ITC Four Country Survey.

Authors:  Bill King; Ron Borland; Michael Le Grande; Richard O'Connor; Geoffrey Fong; Ann McNeill; Dorothy Hatsukami; Michael Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 7.552

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.