Literature DB >> 14645945

Smoking, disease, and obdurate denial: the Australian tobacco industry in the 1980s.

S M Carter1, S Chapman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To contrast the Australian tobacco industry's awareness of the diseases caused by smoking with their aggressive public denial on the relation between smoking and disease in the 1980s.
DESIGN: Analysis of 325 industry documents from the world wide web.
RESULTS: In the 1980s Australian cigarette manufacturers were informed constantly by the international industry of the medical consensus that smoking caused disease. In addition Philip Morris (Australia) Limited received reports of Philip Morris' international biological research programme and visited its Richmond research facility; and WD&HO Wills part funded, co-managed, and contributed research to the British American Tobacco groups' biological research programme. Despite this knowledge, the Australian manufacturers had a policy of arguing to their employees, decision makers, and the general public that questions of smoking and disease were unresolved. The industry catalogued the literature, developed arguments against the main claims made by health groups, and attacked public health advocates who made statements linking smoking to death and disease. Industry studies suggested that a 20-30% minority of the Australian public agreed with the industry on smoking and disease, diminishing across the decade.
CONCLUSION: Australian manufacturers were clearly negligent in the 1980s, deliberately working to undermine Australians' understandings of the diseases caused by smoking despite their own private knowledge. Continuing scepticism about smoking and disease, corresponding with the industry's deceptions, exists in Australian smokers today, suggesting that their actions may have slowed the rate of decline in smoking prevalence. These revelations provide important evidence for Australian litigation and advocacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14645945      PMCID: PMC1766119          DOI: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  10 in total

1.  Shameful science: four decades of the German tobacco industry's hidden research on smoking and health.

Authors:  N Hirschhorn
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  "Operation Berkshire": the international tobacco companies' conspiracy.

Authors:  N Francey; S Chapman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-05

3.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  "It is possible he is a kind of nut": how the tobacco industry quietly promoted Dr William Whitby.

Authors:  S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  "We are anxious to remain anonymous": the use of third party scientific and medical consultants by the Australian tobacco industry, 1969 to 1979.

Authors:  S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Self-exempting beliefs about smoking and health: differences between smokers and ex-smokers.

Authors:  S Chapman; W L Wong; W Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Cooperation and control: the Tobacco Institute of Australia.

Authors:  S M Carter
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  "Australia is one of the darkest markets in the world": the global importance of Australian tobacco control.

Authors:  S Chapman; F Byrne; S M Carter
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 9.  "A deep fragrance of academia": the Australian Tobacco Research Foundation.

Authors:  S Chapman; S M Carter; M Peters
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 10.  "Avoid health warnings on all tobacco products for just as long as we can": a history of Australian tobacco industry efforts to avoid, delay and dilute health warnings on cigarettes.

Authors:  S Chapman; S M Carter
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

  10 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Ensuring smokers are adequately informed: reflections on consumer rights, manufacturer responsibilities, and policy implications.

Authors:  S Chapman; J Liberman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The future of tobacco regulation: a response to a proposal for fundamental institutional change.

Authors:  Jonathan Liberman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  The Philippine tobacco industry: "the strongest tobacco lobby in Asia".

Authors:  K Alechnowicz; S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Philip Morris's health information web site appears responsible but undermines public health.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.462

5.  The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR.

Authors:  Gary Fooks; Anna Gilmore; Jeff Collin; Chris Holden; Kelley Lee
Journal:  J Bus Ethics       Date:  2013-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.