S Chapman1, W L Wong, W Smith. 1. Department of Community Medicine, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to examine the role of self-exempting or cognitive dissonance-reducing beliefs about smoking and health. Such beliefs may hold important implications for the content and targeting of health promotion campaigns. METHODS: A survey of smokers and ex-smokers was conducted in western Sydney, Australia. Six hypotheses were tested. RESULTS: The principal findings were (1) that 27.9% of smokers and 42.1% of ex-smokers agreed that smokers were more likely than non-smokers to get five smoking-related diseases; (2) that for 11 of 14 beliefs tested, more smokers than ex-smokers agreed to a statistically significant degree; (3) that the median number of such beliefs agreed to by smokers was five, compared with three for ex-smokers; (4) that for only 5 of 14 beliefs was agreement expressed by more precontemplative smokers than smokers contemplating or taking action to quit; (5) that more than one in four smokers, despite agreeing that smokers are more likely than non-smokers to get five diseases, nonetheless maintain a set of self-exempting beliefs. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer smokers than ex-smokers accept that smoking causes disease, and smokers also maintain more self-exempting beliefs. Becoming an ex-smoker appears to involve shedding such beliefs in addition to accepting information about the diseases caused by smoking.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to examine the role of self-exempting or cognitive dissonance-reducing beliefs about smoking and health. Such beliefs may hold important implications for the content and targeting of health promotion campaigns. METHODS: A survey of smokers and ex-smokers was conducted in western Sydney, Australia. Six hypotheses were tested. RESULTS: The principal findings were (1) that 27.9% of smokers and 42.1% of ex-smokers agreed that smokers were more likely than non-smokers to get five smoking-related diseases; (2) that for 11 of 14 beliefs tested, more smokers than ex-smokers agreed to a statistically significant degree; (3) that the median number of such beliefs agreed to by smokers was five, compared with three for ex-smokers; (4) that for only 5 of 14 beliefs was agreement expressed by more precontemplative smokers than smokers contemplating or taking action to quit; (5) that more than one in four smokers, despite agreeing that smokers are more likely than non-smokers to get five diseases, nonetheless maintain a set of self-exempting beliefs. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer smokers than ex-smokers accept that smoking causes disease, and smokers also maintain more self-exempting beliefs. Becoming an ex-smoker appears to involve shedding such beliefs in addition to accepting information about the diseases caused by smoking.
Authors: Javier de Miguel Díez; Maria Mercedes Esteban y Peña; Luis Puente Maestu; Valentín Hernández Barrera; Pilar Carrasco Garrido; Luis A Alvarez-Sala Walther; Rodrigo Jiménez García Journal: Lung Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Patrick Peretti-Watel; Jean Constance; Philippe Guilbert; Arnaud Gautier; François Beck; Jean-Paul Moatti Journal: Tob Control Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Smita C Banerjee; Jamie S Ostroff; Thomas A D'Agostino; Sehrish Bari; Mitali Khera; Sudha Acharya; Francesca Gany Journal: Addict Res Theory Date: 2013-08-20
Authors: Neal Doran; Patricia E Sanders; Nicole M Bekman; Matthew J Worley; Teresa K Monreal; Elizabeth McGee; Kevin Cummins; Sandra A Brown Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-03-24 Impact factor: 4.244