Literature DB >> 14645405

American Cancer Society Award lecture. Psychological care of patients: psycho-oncology's contribution.

Jimmie C Holland1.   

Abstract

The centuries-old stigma attached to cancer precluded patients' being told their diagnoses, and thus, delayed any exploration of how they dealt with their illness. This situation changed in the United States in the 1970s when patients began to be told their cancer diagnosis, permitting the first formal study of the psychological impact of cancer. However, a second and equally long-held stigma attached to mental illness has been another barrier and this has kept patients from being willing to acknowledge their psychological problems and to seek counseling. This "double stigma" has slowed the development of psycho-oncology. However, we began to see rapid changes occurring in the last quarter of the 20th century. Valid assessment instruments were developed which were used in well-designed studies. Data from these studies and clinical observations led to increased recognition that psychosocial services are needed by many patients and provide significant assistance in coping with illness. Psycho-oncology has two dimensions: first, the study of the psychological reaction of patients at all stages of the disease, as well as of the family and oncology staff; second, exploring the psychological, social, and behavioral factors that impact on cancer risk and survival. Psycho-oncology now has a recognized role within the oncologic community through clinical care, research, and training as it relates to prevention of cancer through lifestyle changes, evaluation of quality of life, symptom control, palliative care and survivorship. Presently, there are sufficient research studies from which standards of care have been established. Both evidence and consensus-based clinical practice guidelines have been promulgated. It now possible to monitor the quality of existing psychosocial services by using these benchmarks of quality that have evolved in recent years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14645405     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  24 in total

1.  Internet cancer support groups: a feminist analysis.

Authors:  Eun-Ok Im; Wonshik Chee; Hsiu-Min Tsai; Li-Chen Lin; Ching-Yu Cheng
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Barriers to using psycho-oncology services: a qualitative research into the perspectives of users, their relatives, non-users, physicians, and nurses.

Authors:  Melanie Neumann; Maren Galushko; Ute Karbach; Hadass Goldblatt; Adriaan Visser; Markus Wirtz; Nicole Ernstmann; Oliver Ommen; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  [Psycho-oncology : the psyche and cancer].

Authors:  P Heussner; W Hiddemann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  ExCEL in Social Work: Excellence in Cancer Education & Leadership: An Oncology Social Work Response to the 2008 Institute of Medicine Report.

Authors:  Shirley Otis-Green; Barbara Jones; Brad Zebrack; Lisa Kilburn; Terry A Altilio; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Michelle B Riba; Kristine A Donovan; Barbara Andersen; IIana Braun; William S Breitbart; Benjamin W Brewer; Luke O Buchmann; Matthew M Clark; Molly Collins; Cheyenne Corbett; Stewart Fleishman; Sofia Garcia; Donna B Greenberg; Rev George F Handzo; Laura Hoofring; Chao-Hui Huang; Robin Lally; Sara Martin; Lisa McGuffey; William Mitchell; Laura J Morrison; Megan Pailler; Oxana Palesh; Francine Parnes; Janice P Pazar; Laurel Ralston; Jaroslava Salman; Moreen M Shannon-Dudley; Alan D Valentine; Nicole R McMillian; Susan D Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  Ending treatment: the course of emotional adjustment and quality of life among breast cancer survivors immediately following radiation therapy.

Authors:  Teresa Deshields; Tiffany Tibbs; Ming-Yu Fan; Laura Bayer; Marie Taylor; Edwin Fisher
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Sensitivity and specificity of the Distress Thermometer in screening for distress in long-term nasopharyngeal cancer survivors.

Authors:  J S Hong; J Tian
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Affective science perspectives on cancer control: strategically crafting a mutually beneficial research agenda.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Paige A Green; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-05

9.  Cancer-Related Distress: Revisiting the Utility of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer Problem List in Women With Gynecologic Cancers.

Authors:  Patricia I Jewett; Deanna Teoh; Sue Petzel; Heewon Lee; Audrey Messelt; Jeffrey Kendall; Dorothy Hatsukami; Susan A Everson-Rose; Anne H Blaes; Rachel I Vogel
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-02-24

10.  The measure of psychological distress in cancer patients: the use of Distress Thermometer in the Oncological Rehabilitation Center of Florence.

Authors:  Francesco Bulli; Guido Miccinesi; Alice Maruelli; Manuel Katz; Eugenio Paci
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.