Literature DB >> 19727843

Barriers to using psycho-oncology services: a qualitative research into the perspectives of users, their relatives, non-users, physicians, and nurses.

Melanie Neumann1, Maren Galushko, Ute Karbach, Hadass Goldblatt, Adriaan Visser, Markus Wirtz, Nicole Ernstmann, Oliver Ommen, Holger Pfaff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present explorative study was designed as a qualitative evaluation of the psycho-oncology services (POS) available at a psycho-oncology institution (POI) in Germany. The study focused on barriers to using these services.
METHODS: Seven focus groups and five complementary individual interviews were conducted with POS users, their relatives, and POS non-users from a German POI, as well as with oncology physicians and nurses from an affiliated hospital. The focus groups and individual interviews were audiotaped and fully transcribed. Data were analyzed using the documentary method.
RESULTS: Four utilization barriers were identified: (1) patients' and physicians' information deficits about POI and POS, (2) patients' and physicians' subjective norms regarding POS, (3) lack of organizational and therapeutic integration of POI and POS into routine oncology care on the ward, and (4) specific characteristics of cancer patients. The most important finding was that lack of organizational and therapeutic integration of POS in routine oncology care on the ward might have a lasting, negative effect on patients' and physicians' information deficits and subjective norms. Furthermore, the identified utilization barriers seem to be a multi-causal problem with complex interdependencies.
CONCLUSION: Based on these results, the organizational and therapeutic integration of POS in routine oncology care on the POI ward appears to be a useful tool in offering widely accessible therapies and providing patients with concise, straightforward information via different channels, such as personnel, brochures, and the Internet. Nevertheless, the results should be interpreted tentatively, due to the explorative character of this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19727843     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-009-0731-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  20 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

2.  Getting the focus and the group: enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research.

Authors:  P S Kidd; M B Parshall
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2000-05

3.  History of psycho-oncology: overcoming attitudinal and conceptual barriers.

Authors:  Jimmie C Holland
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  Improving supportive care for women with breast cancer in Australia: the challenge of modifying health systems.

Authors:  Sally Redman; Jane Turner; Cindy Davis
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  What about focus group interaction data?

Authors:  Wendy Duggleby
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-07

6.  Focus groups: issues of analysis and interpretation.

Authors:  J Reed; V R Payton
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?

Authors:  R M Andersen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995-03

8.  Using the theory of planned behavior to understand the determinants of exercise intention in patients diagnosed with primary brain cancer.

Authors:  Lee W Jones; Bebe Guill; Stephen T Keir; Karen Carter; Henry S Friedman; Darell D Bigner; David A Reardon
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  IPOS Sutherland Memorial Lecture: an international perspective on the development of psychosocial oncology: overcoming cultural and attitudinal barriers to improve psychosocial care.

Authors:  Jimmie C Holland
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  American Cancer Society Award lecture. Psychological care of patients: psycho-oncology's contribution.

Authors:  Jimmie C Holland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  14 in total

1.  Identifying and predicting subgroups of information needs among cancer patients: an initial study using latent class analysis.

Authors:  Melanie Neumann; Markus Wirtz; Nicole Ernstmann; Oliver Ommen; Alfred Längler; Friedrich Edelhäuser; Christian Scheffer; Diethard Tauschel; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  [Effect of systematic information about psychosocial support services during outpatient radiotherapy. A controlled trial].

Authors:  R O Schiel; W Herzog; H Hof; J Debus; H-C Friederich; A Brechtel; J Rummel; P Freytag; M Hartmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Providing care for the "whole patient" in the cancer setting: the psycho-oncology consultation model of patient care.

Authors:  Teresa L Deshields; Shannon K Nanna
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2010-09

4.  Accessibility, Availability, and Potential Benefits of Psycho-Oncology Services: The Perspective of Community-Based Physicians Providing Cancer Survivorship Care.

Authors:  Verena Zimmermann-Schlegel; Mechthild Hartmann; Halina Sklenarova; Wolfgang Herzog; Markus W Haun
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-04-24

5.  Male coping processes as demonstrated in the context of a cancer-related social support group.

Authors:  Stephen K Trapp; Jacqueline D Woods; Alicia Grove; Marilyn Stern
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Psychosocial service use: a qualitative exploration from the perspective of rural Australian cancer patients.

Authors:  Kate Gunn; Deborah Turnbull; J Lindsay McWha; Matthew Davies; Ian Olver
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  [Psycho-oncological care for melanoma patients: conception and implementation].

Authors:  K Albrecht; F Meiss; T Zeiss; D Nashan; K Reuter
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.751

8.  Understanding why cancer patients accept or turn down psycho-oncological support: a prospective observational study including patients' and clinicians' perspectives on communication about distress.

Authors:  Diana Zwahlen; Theresa Tondorf; Sacha Rothschild; Michael T Koller; Christoph Rochlitz; Alexander Kiss
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Focusing on cancer patients' intentions to use psychooncological support: A longitudinal, mixed-methods study.

Authors:  T Tondorf; A Grossert; S I Rothschild; M T Koller; C Rochlitz; A Kiss; R Schaefert; G Meinlschmidt; S Hunziker; D Zwahlen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 10.  Neuroprotective Potential of Cell-Based Therapies in ALS: From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Serhiy Forostyak; Eva Sykova
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.