Literature DB >> 3125736

Adoption of thrombolytic therapy in the management of acute myocardial infarction.

M A Hlatky1, H Cotugno, C O'Connor, D B Mark, D B Pryor, R M Califf.   

Abstract

A national survey of 1,065 physicians was carried out to document current use of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In early 1987, thrombolytic therapy was used by 66% of respondents. Among those who used thrombolytic therapy, 92% used streptokinase, 13% used tissue-type plasminogen activator and 3% used urokinase. Most (72%) used intravenous administration exclusively and only 5% used intracoronary administration exclusively. Despite widespread acceptance of thrombolytic therapy, most physicians gave it to less than 25% of their patients. Duration of symptoms was rated as the single most important factor affecting the decision to use thrombolytic therapy; 45% had a time limit of less than 4 hours and 85% had a time limit of less than 6 hours. Complications of AMI and electrocardiographic findings were factors also considered in the decision to give this therapy. A physician's adoption of thrombolytic therapy was significantly associated with several characteristics: specialty type, number of AMI patients treated, physician age and access to cardiac catheterization. In addition, physicians using thrombolytic therapy had a significantly different use of medications and laboratory tests for all patients with AMI. This survey documents rapid acceptance of thrombolytic therapy for AMI, particularly in patients with short duration of symptoms or evidence of high risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3125736     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90755-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

Review 1.  Knowledge, patterns of care, and outcomes of care for generalists and specialists.

Authors:  L R Harrold; T S Field; J H Gurwitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health.

Authors:  A L Siu; E A McGlynn; H Morgenstern; M H Beers; D M Carlisle; E B Keeler; J Beloff; K Curtin; J Leaning; B C Perry
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Adoption of liquid-based cervical cancer screening tests by family physicians and gynecologists.

Authors:  Karen M Rappaport; Christopher B Forrest; Neil A Holtzman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Physicians' Use of Heparin Following Thrombolytic Therapy: An International Perspective.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Doctors and medical science.

Authors:  Moyez Jiwa
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2012-09-09

6.  British Heart Foundation surveys (1987 and 1989) of United Kingdom treatment policies for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Collins; D Julian
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-09

7.  Emergency primary coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction who are unsuitable for intravenous thrombolysis.

Authors:  C J McKenna; M Codd; H A McCann; D D Sugrue
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1995 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Analysis of prehospital delay among inner-city patients with symptoms of myocardial infarction: implications for therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  L T Clark; S V Bellam; A H Shah; J G Feldman
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  Management of high blood cholesterol by primary care physicians: diffusion of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel guidelines.

Authors:  S Shea; D H Gemson; P Mossel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Physician age and outcomes in elderly patients in hospital in the US: observational study.

Authors:  Yusuke Tsugawa; Joseph P Newhouse; Alan M Zaslavsky; Daniel M Blumenthal; Anupam B Jena
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.