Literature DB >> 14644336

Genetic susceptibility, biomarker respones, and cancer.

Hannu Norppa1.   

Abstract

A large number of studies have reported associations between polymorphisms of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes (XMEs) and various cancers. However, the carcinogenic exposures behind such findings have usually been unclear. Information on susceptibility to specific carcinogens could better be obtained by examining situations where the exposure and the endpoint studied are nearer in time, i.e., by studying biomarkers of carcinogen exposure and early (genotoxic) effect in exposed humans. For example, analyses of DNA adducts and cytogenetic endpoints have indicated an increased susceptibility of glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) null genotype to genotoxicity of tobacco smoking, supporting the view that the associations of the GSTM1 null genotype with bladder and lung cancer are partly related to smoking. In vitro genotoxicity studies with human cells offer an experimental tool that can be used, within the limits of the cell systems, to predict individual sensitivity and genotype-carcinogen interactions. In vitro sensitivity to the genotoxicity of 1,2:3,4-diepoxybutane, an epoxide metabolite of 1,3-butadiene has clearly been shown to depend on GSTT1 genotype, which has also been implicated to modify, along with GSTM1 genotype, the in vitro genotoxicity of 1,2-epoxy-3-butene, another epoxide metabolite of 1,3-butadiene. These genotypes appear to modulate the excretion of 1,3-butadiene-specific mercapturic acids, and influence genotoxicity biomarker levels in 1,3-butadiene-exposed workers. The excretion of specific mercapturic acids (PHEMA) in workers exposed to styrene has clearly been shown to depend on GSTM1 genotype, and GSTT1 genotype seems to modulate the excretion of one PHEMA diastereoisomer. These genotypes have also been implicated to modulate the in vitro genotoxicity of styrene. In general, the genetic polymorphisms potentially important for biomarker response largely depend on the exposing agent, biological material examined, and ethnicity of the population under study. Individual exposure level may vary a lot, and a reliable estimate of the exposure is essential for correct interpretation of genotype-exposure interaction. Besides XME polymorphisms, any polymorphisms that affect cellular response to DNA damage could, in principle, modify individual sensitivity to genotoxins. For instance, those concerning DNA repair proteins are presently being studied by many laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14644336     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  10 in total

Review 1.  Glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) gene polymorphism and gastric cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Bo Chen; Lei Cao; Yong Zhou; Ping Yang; Hong-Wei Wan; Gui-Qing Jia; Liu Liu; Xiao-Ting Wu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Association study of SNPs of genes IFNGR1 (rs137854905), GSTT1 (rs71748309), and GSTP1 (rs1695) in gastric cancer development in samples of patient in the northern and northeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Rubistenia Miranda Soares de Araújo; Cynthia Farias Vieira de Melo; Fidelis Manes Neto; Juarez Nóbrega da Silva; Leonardo Ferreira Soares; Marilia de Arruda Cardoso Smith; Edilson Carvalho Sousa; Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano; Arnaldo Correia de Medeiros; Eleonidas Moura Lima
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-01-23

3.  ERCC2 Lys751Gln and Asp312Asn polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bo Chen; Yong Zhou; Ping Yang; Xiao-Ting Wu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Effect of occupational exposure to cytostatics and nucleotide excision repair polymorphism on chromosomal aberrations frequency.

Authors:  L'udovít Mušák; Veronika Poláková; Erika Halašová; Oto Osina; Ludmila Vodičková; Janka Buchancová; Henrieta Hudečková; Pavel Vodička
Journal:  Interdiscip Toxicol       Date:  2009-03

5.  Patterns of persistent DNA damage associated with sun exposure and the glutathione S-transferase M1 genotype in melanoma patients.

Authors:  Mark L Steinberg; Karen Hubbard; Charles Utti; Brian Clas; Bor-Jang Hwang; Helene Z Hill; Irene Orlow
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Interindividual Differences in DNA Adduct Formation and Detoxification of 1,3-Butadiene-Derived Epoxide in Human HapMap Cell Lines.

Authors:  Amanda Degner; Rashi Arora; Luke Erber; Christopher Chao; Lisa A Peterson; Natalia Y Tretyakova
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  Wider action plan and multidisciplinar approach could be a wining idea in creation of friendly environment.

Authors:  Natasa Gojkovic-Bukvic; Nenad Bukvic
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2012-02-08

8.  GSTM1 polymorphism contribute to colorectal cancer in Asian populations: a prospective meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Li; Wen Xu; Fang Liu; Silin Huang; Meirong He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The Scope of Big Data in One Medicine: Unprecedented Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Molly E McCue; Annette M McCoy
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-11-16

10.  The role of oxidative DNA damage and GSTM1, GSTT1, and hOGG1 gene polymorphisms in coronary artery disease risk.

Authors:  Ela Kadıoğlu; Gülten Taçoy; Eren Özçağlı; Kaan Okyay; Mehmet K Akboğa; Atiye Çengel; Semra Şardaş
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 1.596

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.