Literature DB >> 19962999

Interval timing disruptions in subjects with cerebellar lesions.

Cynthia M Gooch1, Martin Wiener, Elaine B Wencil, H Branch Coslett.   

Abstract

The cerebellum has long been implicated in time perception, particularly in the subsecond range. The current set of studies examines the role of the cerebellum in suprasecond timing, using analysis of behavioral data in subjects with cerebellar lesions. Eleven cerebellar lesion subjects and 17 controls were tested on temporal estimation, reproduction and production, for times ranging from 2 to 12s. Cerebellar patients overproduced times on both the reproduction and production tasks; the effect was greatest at the shortest duration. A subset of patients also underestimated intervals. Cerebellar patients were significantly more variable on the estimation and reproduction tasks. No significant differences between normal and cerebellar patients were found on temporal discrimination tasks with either sub- or suprasecond times. Patients with damage to the lateral superior hemispheres or the dentate nuclei showed more significant impairments than those with damage elsewhere in the cerebellum, and patients with damage to the left cerebellum had more significant differences from controls than those with damage to the right. These data suggest that damage to the middle-to-superior lobules or the left hemisphere is especially detrimental to timing suprasecond intervals. We suggest that this region be considered part of a network of brain structures including the DLPFC that is crucial for interval timing. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19962999      PMCID: PMC2828532          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  67 in total

1.  Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: evidence against a single timing process for motor control.

Authors:  S D Robertson; H N Zelaznik; D A Lantero; K G Bojczyk; R M Spencer; J G Doffin; T Schneidt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Cerebellar projections to the prefrontal cortex of the primate.

Authors:  F A Middleton; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Selective deficit of time perception in a patient with right prefrontal cortex lesion.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Massimiliano Oliveri; Giovanni A Carlesimo; Carlo Caltagirone
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-11-26       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Remembering the time: a continuous clock.

Authors:  Penelope A Lewis; R Chris Miall
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 5.  Cellular basis of working memory.

Authors:  P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Dissociation of the lateral and medial cerebellum in movement timing and movement execution.

Authors:  R B Ivry; S W Keele; H C Diener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Maximum likelihood estimation: the best PEST.

Authors:  A Pentland
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

9.  Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function.

Authors:  F A Middleton; P L Strick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-10-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Corticopontine projection in the macaque: the distribution of labelled cortical cells after large injections of horseradish peroxidase in the pontine nuclei.

Authors:  M Glickstein; J G May; B E Mercier
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1985-05-15       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing.

Authors:  Jennifer T Coull; Ruey-Kuang Cheng; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Aberrant connections between climbing fibres and Purkinje cells induce alterations in the timing of an instrumental response in the rat.

Authors:  Lorena Gaytán-Tocavén; Miguel Ángel López-Vázquez; Miguel Ángel Guevara; María Esther Olvera-Cortés
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Functional MRI of dynamic judgments of spatial extent.

Authors:  Marc Hurwitz; Derick Valadao; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Pathophysiological distortions in time perception and timed performance.

Authors:  Melissa J Allman; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Taxonomies of Timing: Where Does the Cerebellum Fit In?

Authors:  Assaf Breska; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-04

6.  Toward an Integration of Deep Learning and Neuroscience.

Authors:  Adam H Marblestone; Greg Wayne; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Cerebellar D1DR-expressing neurons modulate the frontal cortex during timing tasks.

Authors:  Jonah Heskje; Kelsey Heslin; Benjamin J De Corte; Kyle P Walsh; Youngcho Kim; Sangwoo Han; Erik S Carlson; Krystal L Parker
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Dissociable neural systems for timing: evidence from subjects with basal ganglia lesions.

Authors:  H Branch Coslett; Martin Wiener; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold is increased in patients with cerebellar atrophy.

Authors:  Fiore Manganelli; Raffaele Dubbioso; Chiara Pisciotta; Antonella Antenora; Maria Nolano; Giuseppe De Michele; Alessandro Filla; Alfredo Berardelli; Lucio Santoro
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Individual differences in the morphometry and activation of time perception networks are influenced by dopamine genotype.

Authors:  Martin Wiener; Yune-Sang Lee; Falk W Lohoff; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.