Literature DB >> 14639480

Ultrasonographic assessment of human skeletal muscle size.

Neil D Reeves1, Constantinos N Maganaris, Marco V Narici.   

Abstract

The measurement of human muscle size is essential when assessing the effects of training, disuse and ageing. The considered 'gold standard' for cross-sectional area measurements of muscle size is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, MRI is costly and often inaccessible. The aim of the present study was to test the reproducibility and validity of a more accessible alternative method using ultrasonography (ULT). We examined the cross-sectional areas in the vastus lateralis muscle of six individuals. Axial-plane ULT scans were taken at given levels along the entire muscle length. The ULT scanning was repeated on different days (reliability) and validated against MRI-based measurements. Mean intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.998 for the reliability of ULT and 0.999 for the validity of ULT against MRI. The coefficient of variation values for cross-sectional area measurements assessed by six different experimenters were 2.1% and 0.8% for images obtained with ULT and MRI, respectively. The ULT method is a valid and reliable alternative tool for assessing cross-sectional areas of large individual human muscles. The present findings justify the application of the ULT method for the detection of changes throughout large muscles in response to training, disuse or as a consequence of sarcopenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14639480     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-0961-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  8 in total

1.  Measurement of human muscle volume using ultrasonography.

Authors:  Joseph I Esformes; Marco V Narici; Constantinos N Maganaris
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses.

Authors:  G Rankin; M Stokes
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.477

3.  Effects of lower limb unloading on skeletal muscle mass and function in humans.

Authors:  H E Berg; G A Dudley; T Häggmark; H Ohlsén; P A Tesch
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1991-04

4.  Muscle ultrasonography and computed tomography in elderly trained and untrained women.

Authors:  S Sipilä; H Suominen
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Changes in lower limb muscle cross-sectional area and tissue fluid volume after transition from standing to supine.

Authors:  H E Berg; B Tedner; P A Tesch
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1993-08

6.  Lower limb skeletal muscle function after 6 wk of bed rest.

Authors:  H E Berg; L Larsson; P A Tesch
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1997-01

Review 7.  Sarcopenia: current concepts.

Authors:  R Roubenoff; V A Hughes
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  High-intensity strength training in nonagenarians. Effects on skeletal muscle.

Authors:  M A Fiatarone; E C Marks; N D Ryan; C N Meredith; L A Lipsitz; W J Evans
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

  8 in total
  107 in total

Review 1.  The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans.

Authors:  Mathias Wernbom; Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Coracoid transfer in Bristow-Latarjet procedure: does it modify the biceps muscle?

Authors:  Filippo Castoldi; Roberto Rossi; Nicola Lollino; Federico Renzulli; Elena Berrino; Paolo Rossi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Neural and muscular changes to detraining after electrostimulation training.

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Marie Guette; Yves Ballay; Alain Martin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Comparison of conventional resistance training and the fly-wheel ergometer for training the quadriceps muscle group in patients with unilateral knee injury.

Authors:  Jim Greenwood; Matthew C Morrissey; Olga M Rutherford; Marco V Narici
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Delayed-onset muscle soreness induced by low-load blood flow-restricted exercise.

Authors:  Jonathan D Umbel; Richard L Hoffman; Douglas J Dearth; Gary S Chleboun; Todd M Manini; Brian C Clark
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Panoramic ultrasonography is a valid method to measure changes in skeletal muscle cross-sectional area.

Authors:  Juha P Ahtiainen; Merja Hoffren; Juha J Hulmi; Mikko Pietikäinen; Antti A Mero; Janne Avela; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Unintentional weight loss: what radiologists need to know and what clinicians want to know.

Authors:  Sanjay Rao; Elias George Kikano; Daniel Arnold Smith; Ezgi Guler; Sree Harsha Tirumani; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-01-01

8.  Effects of the Drop-set and Reverse Drop-set Methods on the Muscle Activity and Intramuscular Oxygenation of the Triceps Brachii among Trained and Untrained Individuals.

Authors:  Masahiro Goto; Shinsuke Nirengi; Yuko Kurosawa; Akinori Nagano; Takafumi Hamaoka
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

10.  Reliability of measuring abductor hallucis muscle parameters using two different diagnostic ultrasound machines.

Authors:  Wayne A Hing; Keith Rome; Alyse Fm Cameron
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.