OBJECTIVES: Randomised trials on breast cancer showed no significant benefit from post-operative follow-up with clinical and/or conventional radiological means. We hypothesised that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polipeptyde antigen (TPA), breast cancer associated antigen 115 D8/DF3 (CA15.3) tumour marker panel is sensitive enough for significantly anticipating salvage treatment and prolonging survival of relapsing breast cancer patients. METHODS:From October 1981 to May 1999, 68 (62%) of 109 patients with distant metastases were recruited. Thirty-six (53%) received salvage treatment at the time of significant increase in one or more components of CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour marker panel and negative instrumental examinations ("tumour marker guided" treatment) and 32 (47%) were treated only after radiological confirmation of metastases (conventional treatment). The prognostic factors of the two groups did not show any statistically significant difference. RESULTS: The time from one or more tumour marker increase to clear clinical and/or radiological signs of distant metastases (lead time) was significantly prolonged in the 36 patients with "tumour marker guided" treatment (17.3 +/- 13.1 vs. 2.9 +/- 2.9 months, P < 0.001, Wilcoxon test) as well as the survival curves from salvage therapy and from mastectomy (the proportion of survivors was: at 36 months from salvage therapy 28% vs. 9%, P = 0.0094; at 84 months from mastectomy 42% vs. 19%, P = 0.0017). The multivariate Cox analysis showed that time from mastectomy to tumour marker increase and "tumour marker guided" salvage treatment were the only significantly different variables (P = 0.00001 and 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: These data point out that "tumour marker guided" salvage treatment significantly prolongs disease-free and overall survivals of relapsing responsive patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Randomised trials on breast cancer showed no significant benefit from post-operative follow-up with clinical and/or conventional radiological means. We hypothesised that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polipeptyde antigen (TPA), breast cancer associated antigen 115 D8/DF3 (CA15.3) tumour marker panel is sensitive enough for significantly anticipating salvage treatment and prolonging survival of relapsing breast cancerpatients. METHODS: From October 1981 to May 1999, 68 (62%) of 109 patients with distant metastases were recruited. Thirty-six (53%) received salvage treatment at the time of significant increase in one or more components of CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour marker panel and negative instrumental examinations ("tumour marker guided" treatment) and 32 (47%) were treated only after radiological confirmation of metastases (conventional treatment). The prognostic factors of the two groups did not show any statistically significant difference. RESULTS: The time from one or more tumour marker increase to clear clinical and/or radiological signs of distant metastases (lead time) was significantly prolonged in the 36 patients with "tumour marker guided" treatment (17.3 +/- 13.1 vs. 2.9 +/- 2.9 months, P < 0.001, Wilcoxon test) as well as the survival curves from salvage therapy and from mastectomy (the proportion of survivors was: at 36 months from salvage therapy 28% vs. 9%, P = 0.0094; at 84 months from mastectomy 42% vs. 19%, P = 0.0017). The multivariate Cox analysis showed that time from mastectomy to tumour marker increase and "tumour marker guided" salvage treatment were the only significantly different variables (P = 0.00001 and 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: These data point out that "tumour marker guided" salvage treatment significantly prolongs disease-free and overall survivals of relapsing responsive patients.
Authors: Joseph Sparano; Anne O'Neill; Katherine Alpaugh; Antonio C Wolff; Donald W Northfelt; Chau T Dang; George W Sledge; Kathy D Miller Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: N Lynn Henry; Lynn N Henry; Daniel F Hayes; Scott D Ramsey; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; William E Barlow; Julie R Gralow Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Peter McAnena; Kahraman Tanriverdi; Catherine Curran; K Gilligan; Jane E Freedman; James A L Brown; Michael J Kerin Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 4.430