Literature DB >> 14635086

Change in smoking status after spiral chest computed tomography scan screening.

Lisa Sanderson Cox1, Matthew M Clark, James R Jett, Christi A Patten, Darrell R Schroeder, Liza M Nirelli, Stephen J Swensen, Richard D Hurt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer screening may provide a "teachable moment" for the reduction of high-risk behaviors. The current study evaluated smoking behavior changes in current and former smokers after low-dose, fast spiral chest computed tomography scan (CT) screening for lung carcinoma.
METHODS: The study was comprised of 901 current smokers and 574 former smokers who participated in a low-dose, fast spiral chest CT scan screening study for lung carcinoma. Demographic, pulmonary function, screening recommendations, and smoking history variables were evaluated as predictors of self-reported point prevalence smoking abstinence 1 year after screening.
RESULTS: Of the current smokers at baseline, 14% reported smoking abstinence at follow-up. Older age and poorer lung function were associated with smoking abstinence. Ninety percent of former smokers reported smoking abstinence at a 1-year of follow-up. A longer duration of smoking abstinence at baseline was found to be predictive of abstinence in this group.
CONCLUSIONS: The 14% smoking abstinence rate was higher than would be expected for spontaneous rates of smoking cessation. Therefore, screening may provide a teachable moment for smokers. Low-dose, fast spiral chest CT scan screening recommendations were not found to be associated with smoking behavior change in either group. Further research is needed to evaluate the potential avenues through which lung carcinoma screening can be used as an opportunity for providing effective nicotine interventions. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14635086     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  42 in total

1.  Effect of smoking cessation counseling within a randomised study on early detection of lung cancer in Germany.

Authors:  M Bade; V Bähr; U Brandt; A Eigentopf; T Brüchert; M-L Gross; E Motsch; N Becker
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Screening for lung cancer using low dose CT scanning: results of 2 year follow up.

Authors:  R MacRedmond; G McVey; M Lee; R W Costello; D Kenny; C Foley; P M Logan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Quality of life and healthcare use in a randomized controlled lung cancer screening study.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Nancy Obuchowski; Alex Z Fu; Michael Phillips; Moulay Meziane
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2013-08

Review 4.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a review of current status.

Authors:  Henry M Marshall; Rayleen V Bowman; Ian A Yang; Kwun M Fong; Christine D Berg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Pairing smoking-cessation services with lung cancer screening: A clinical guideline from the Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence and the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

Authors:  Lisa M Fucito; Sharon Czabafy; Peter S Hendricks; Chris Kotsen; Donna Richardson; Benjamin A Toll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Tobacco Dependence Predicts Higher Lung Cancer and Mortality Rates and Lower Rates of Smoking Cessation in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Alana M Rojewski; Nichole T Tanner; Lin Dai; James G Ravenel; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Gerard A Silvestri; Benjamin A Toll
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Estimating long-term effectiveness of lung cancer screening in the Mayo CT screening study.

Authors:  Pamela M McMahon; Chung Yin Kong; Bruce E Johnson; Milton C Weinstein; Jane C Weeks; Karen M Kuntz; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Stephen J Swensen; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The Relations Between False Positive and Negative Screens and Smoking Cessation and Relapse in the National Lung Screening Trial: Implications for Public Health.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; Jeremy J Gorelick; JoRean D Sicks; Elyse R Park; Amanda L Graham; David B Abrams; Ilana F Gareen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Capitalizing on a teachable moment: Development of a targeted self-help smoking cessation intervention for patients receiving lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Lauren R Meltzer; Marina Unrod; Vani N Simmons; Karen O Brandon; Bárbara Piñeiro; Amanda M Palmer; Thomas H Brandon
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Smoking behavior 1 year after computed tomography screening for lung cancer: Effect of physician referral for abnormal CT findings.

Authors:  Mindi A Styn; Stephanie R Land; Kenneth A Perkins; David O Wilson; Marjorie Romkes; Joel L Weissfeld
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.