Literature DB >> 14634406

Neurophysiological evidence may predict the outcome of sacral neuromodulation.

S Malaguti1, M Spinelli, G Giardiello, M Lazzeri, U Van Den Hombergh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chronic stimulation of the sacral nerves has now become one of the most accepted stimulation therapies for functional lower urinary tract symptoms refractory to conservative treatment. Despite the existence of a large amount of literature on sacral neuromodulation (SNM) showing a fairly high percent of significant improvement in clinical outcome there are few experimental studies of SNM stimulus parameters and/or neurophysiological monitoring. We evaluated the specific action of SNM on the primary sensory cortical area. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) of the pudendal and posterior tibial nerves were evaluated in patients implanted with a monolateral permanent quadripolar electrode.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 patients underwent stage 1 monolateral sacral nerve implantation. Three SEP patterns were evaluated; namely before implantation, 1 month after stage 1 with stimulation set at 21 Hz and again with a pulse rate of 40 Hz.
RESULTS: In all patients SNM produced a significant decrease in pudendal SEP latency of the first positive deflection between baseline SNM stimulation at different pulse rates at the ipsilateral and contralateral implant sites. This finding was evidence of the effect of S3 SNM on the cortical sensory area and the specificity of pudendal SEPs in measuring how SNM modulates the afferent pathway from the spinal nerve to the cortical sensory area.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms previous observations that SNM acts by the afferent pathway at the cortical site level and it sheds light on so-called idiopathic lower urinary tract symptoms. A modification of SEPs induced by SNM seems to be a prognostic factor of clinical outcomes. The action of SNM on the afferent pathway from the sacral area to the somatosensory cortex is specific and neurophysiological evaluation via pudendal SEPs provides evidence to this effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14634406     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000095921.81600.4d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  Sacral nerve stimulation: neuromodulation for voiding dysfunction and pain.

Authors:  Robert D Mayer; Fred M Howard
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Sacral neuromodulation in congenital lumbo-sacral and traumatic spinal cord defects with neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms: a single-center experience in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Farzaneh Sharifiaghdas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Efficacy of cyclic sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence.

Authors:  S Norderval; C Behrenbruch; R Brouwer; J O Keck
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Neuromodulation and the role of electrodiagnostic techniques.

Authors:  Karen L Noblett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Neuromodulation versus medication for overactive bladder: the case for early intervention.

Authors:  Frank N Burks; Kenneth M Peters
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Sacral neuromodulation: does it affect the rectoanal angle in patients with fecal incontinence?

Authors:  O Uludağ; S M P Koch; R F Vliegen; C H C Dejong; W G van Gemert; C G M I Baeten
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Predictive Factors in Sacral Neuromodulation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ranjana Jairam; Jamie Drossaerts; Tom Marcelissen; Gommert van Koeveringe; Desiree Vrijens; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 1.934

Review 8.  Physical Agent-Based Treatments for Overactive Bladder: A Review.

Authors:  Nurida Khasanah; Hung-Yen Chin; Chih-Wei Peng
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 9.  Current and future techniques of neuromodulation for bladder dysfunction.

Authors:  Neil D Sherman; Cindy L Amundsen
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 10.  Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Thomas C Dudding; Paul A Lehur; Michael Sørensen; Stefan Engelberg; Maria Paola Bertapelle; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Karel Everaert; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Charles H Knowles; Lilli Lundby; Klaus E Matzel; Arantxa Muñoz-Duyos; Mona B Rydningen; Stefan de Wachter
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-07-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.