Literature DB >> 20162279

Sacral neuromodulation: does it affect the rectoanal angle in patients with fecal incontinence?

O Uludağ1, S M P Koch, R F Vliegen, C H C Dejong, W G van Gemert, C G M I Baeten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the past decade numerous studies have been published on the successful treatment of fecal incontinence with sacral neuromodulation (SNM). The underlying mechanism of action for lower bowel motility disorders has been unclear. In the present study, the effect of SNM on the rectoanal angle in patients with fecal incontinence was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 12 consecutive patients who qualified for SNM an X-defecography study was performed before SNM and at 6 months after permanent implant. Three single lateral rectal views were taken: one during rest, one during squeeze, and one during Valsalva's maneuver, after which the patient was asked to evacuate as rapidly and completely as possible during lateral fluoroscopy. At 6 months two further defecography studies were performed, one during stimulation with the pacemaker on and one with the pacemaker off.
RESULTS: The defecography studies showed that the rectoanal angle decreased during rest, squeeze, and Valsalva's maneuver. A slight increase in rectoanal angle was seen during defecation. However, the differences did not reach statistical significance. Sacral neuromodulation improved fecal continence significantly in all patients at 6 months. Median incontinence episodes per week decreased from 6.2 to 1.0 (P = 0.001), and incontinent days per week decreased from 3.7 to 1.0 (P = 0.001) with SNM. There were no significant changes in the median resting and squeeze anal canal pressures, 46.5 versus 49.7 mmHg and 67.1 versus 72.3 mmHg, respectively. Median stimulation amplitude at follow-up was 2.7 V (range: 0.9-5.3 V).
CONCLUSIONS: Rectoanal angle did not decrease significantly in patients with fecal incontinence during SNM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20162279     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0474-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  28 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation and pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback in patients with fecal incontinence: a cohort study of 281 patients.

Authors:  M P Terra; A C Dobben; B Berghmans; M Deutekom; C G M I Baeten; L W M Janssen; G E E Boeckxstaens; A F Engel; R J F Felt-Bersma; J F M Slors; M F Gerhards; A B Bijnen; E Everhardt; W R Schouten; P M M Bossuyt; J Stoker
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal disorders: evolution, current status, and future directions.

Authors:  K E Matzel
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2007

3.  Effect of sacral neuromodulation on the rectum.

Authors:  O Uludag; G L Morren; C H C Dejong; C G M I Baeten
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Sacral nerve stimulation reduces corticoanal excitability in patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  R Sheldon; E S Kiff; A Clarke; M L Harris; S Hamdy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Different brain effects during chronic and acute sacral neuromodulation in urge incontinent patients with implanted neurostimulators.

Authors:  Bertil F M Blok; Jan Groen; J L H Ruud Bosch; Dick J Veltman; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Determination of therapeutic threshold in sacral nerve modulation for faecal incontinence.

Authors:  S M P Koch; W G van Gemert; C G M I Baeten
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Rectal sensorimotor dysfunction in patients with urge faecal incontinence: evidence from prolonged manometric studies.

Authors:  C L H Chan; P J Lunniss; D Wang; N S Williams; S M Scott
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence: a single-center study.

Authors:  Ozenç Uludağ; Sacha M P Koch; Wim G van Gemert; Cees H C Dejong; Cor G M I Baeten
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Joe J Tjandra; Miranda K Y Chan; Chung Hung Yeh; Carolyn Murray-Green
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Anal incontinence after childbirth.

Authors:  A H Sultan
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.927

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prospective clinical audit of two neuromodulatory treatments for fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS).

Authors:  Alexander Hotouras; Jamie Murphy; Marion Allison; Anne Curry; Norman S Williams; Charles H Knowles; Christopher L Chan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Anorectal angle at rest predicting successful sacral nerve stimulation in idiopathic fecal incontinence-a cohort analysis.

Authors:  Cathérine T Kollmann; Elise B Pretzsch; Andreas Kunz; Christoph Isbert; Katica Krajinovic; Joachim Reibetanz; Mia Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.