Literature DB >> 18042323

Current and future techniques of neuromodulation for bladder dysfunction.

Neil D Sherman1, Cindy L Amundsen.   

Abstract

Recent increase in the use of neuromodulation for the treatment of urinary urgency and frequency, urge incontinence, and nonobstructive urinary retention has coincided with improved knowledge of micturition physiology and concurrent technologic advances in nerve stimulation. Currently, the most common technology for bladder neuromodulation involves stimulation through the S3 foramen, or sacral neuromodulation, although other techniques of neuromodulation continue to be explored. Despite many advances in neuromodulation, the exact mechanism of action remains uncertain. Additionally, which patients will respond to neuromodulation remains unclear, and although there is a standard method for testing, this procedure is invasive and expensive. As we continue to improve patient selection criteria and better understand the mechanism of action, the efficacy and patient satisfaction should continue to increase. Currently, most patients considered for implantation with a neuromodulator are those unresponsive to other conservative treatments for bladder dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18042323     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-007-0047-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   2.862


  47 in total

1.  Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for treatment of detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  B J Andrews; J M Reynard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence after stress incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Neil D Sherman; Margaret G Jamison; George D Webster; Cindy L Amundsen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Improving neuromodulation technique for refractory voiding dysfunctions: two-stage implant.

Authors:  R A Janknegt; E H Weil; P H Eerdmans
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Percutaneous peripheral neuromodulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  A Shafik; I Ahmed; O El-Sibai; R M Mostafa
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.745

5.  Spinal pathways mediate coordinated bladder/urethral sphincter activity during reflex micturition in decerebrate and spinalized neonatal rats.

Authors:  M N Kruse; W C de Groat
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1993-04-02       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Long-term results of a multicenter study on sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of urinary urge incontinence, urgency-frequency, and retention.

Authors:  S W Siegel; F Catanzaro; H E Dijkema; M M Elhilali; C J Fowler; J B Gajewski; M M Hassouna; R A Janknegt; U Jonas; P E van Kerrebroeck; A A Lycklama a Nijeholt; K A Oleson; R A Schmidt
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-04       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  In patients undergoing neuromodulation for intractable urge incontinence a reduction in 24-hr pad weight after the initial test stimulation best predicts long-term patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Raymond T Foster; Elizabeth J Anoia; George D Webster; Cindy L Amundsen
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  A novel surgical technique for implanting a new electrostimulation system for treating female overactive bladder: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Israel Nissenkorn; Peter R De Jong
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Preliminary results of sacral neuromodulation in 23 children.

Authors:  Mitchell R Humphreys; David R Vandersteen; Jeffery M Slezak; Pam Hollatz; Craig A Smith; Janet E Smith; Yuri E Reinberg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Unilateral versus bilateral sacral neuromodulation in patients with chronic voiding dysfunction.

Authors:  W A Scheepens; R A de Bie; E H J Weil; Ph E V van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of clinical studies of electrical stimulation for treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  Ash K Monga; Michael R Tracey; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Alternative approaches to sacral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Kenneth M Peters
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation for the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Meredith J McGee; Cindy L Amundsen; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  A spinal GABAergic mechanism is necessary for bladder inhibition by pudendal afferent stimulation.

Authors:  Meredith J McGee; Zachary C Danziger; Jeremy A Bamford; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2014-08-20

5.  An improved genetic algorithm for designing optimal temporal patterns of neural stimulation.

Authors:  Isaac R Cassar; Nathan D Titus; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 6.  Neuromodulation for Chronic Pelvic Pain.

Authors:  Justina Tam; Charles Loeb; Daniel Grajower; Jason Kim; Steven Weissbart
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation treatment on lower urinary tract symptoms after class III radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: study protocol for a multicentre, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiu-Li Sun; Hai-Bo Wang; Zhi-Qi Wang; Ting-Ting Cao; Xin Yang; Jing-Song Han; Yang-Feng Wu; Kathleen H Reilly; Jian-Liu Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.