Literature DB >> 14630259

Hypofractionated conformal radiotherapy in carcinoma of the prostate: five-year outcome analysis.

Jacqueline E Livsey1, Richard A Cowan, James P Wylie, Ric Swindell, Graham Read, Vincent S Khoo, John P Logue.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent publications have indicated that the alpha/beta ratios for carcinoma of the prostate are much lower than had originally been thought, suggesting that prostate cancer may be highly sensitive to fraction size. We have reviewed our unique experience of the use of 3.13 Gy fractions in a large cohort of men treated homogeneously in a single institute.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The outcome for 705 men with T1-T4, N0, M0 prostate cancer who received conformal radiotherapy between 1995 and 1998 at this center was analyzed. No patient received hormonal manipulation. Mean age was 68 years (range: 49-84 years). Median pretreatment PSA was 13 ng/mL (range: 0.6-270 ng/mL). Disease characteristics were as follows: Stage T1, 125 (18%); T2, 365 (52%); T3/4, 215 (30%); Gleason 2-6, 463 (66%); Gleason 7-10, 242 (34%); pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL, 291 (41%); 10 to < or =20, 228 (32%); >20, 186 (27%). Median follow-up was 48 months (range: 1-82 months). Biochemical-free survival (bNED) was defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Radiotherapy was delivered to a planning target volume (prostate plus all/base of the seminal vesicles dependent on risk criteria with a 1-cm margin) with a 4-field conformal technique to a dose of 50 Gy in 16 daily fractions over 22 days.
RESULTS: The 5-year bNED survival was significantly associated (p < 0.001) with pretreatment PSA, stage, and Gleason score. Five-year bNED rates with respect to pretreatment characteristics were as follows: 73% (PSA < or =10), 52% (>10-20), 35% (>20), 64% (Stage T1/2), 38% (T3/4), 61% (Gleason score 2-6), and 46% (Gleason > or =7). When patients were grouped into good (Stage T1/2, PSA < or =10 ng/mL, and Gleason score <7) (n = 181), intermediate (1 raised value) (n = 247), or poor (2 or more raised values) (n = 277) prognostic groups, the bNED was, respectively, 82%, 56%, and 39%. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade > or =2 bowel toxicity was 5% and bladder 9%.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the delivery of a relatively low total dose using a hypofractionated regime results in similar tumor control and normal-tissue toxicity to 65-70 Gy delivered in 1.8-2 Gy fractions. These data suggest that this is an acceptable regime for good-prognosis patients. However, because of the evidence for a dose effect at doses above 70 Gy with "conventional fractionation," we are now treating intermediate- and poor-risk patients within a hypofractionated dose escalation trial to 60 Gy in 20 fractions using intensity- modulated radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14630259     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00752-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  21 in total

1.  The 5-year outcomes of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (66 Gy in 22 fractions, 3 fractions per week) for localized prostate cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yaichiro Hashimoto; Atsushi Motegi; Tetsuo Akimoto; Norio Mitsuhashi; Junpei Iizuka; Kazunari Tanabe; Yuka Ishii; Sawa Kono; Sachiko Izumi; Kumiko Karasawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Confirmation of a low α/β ratio for prostate cancer treated by external beam radiation therapy alone using a post-treatment repeated-measures model for PSA dynamics.

Authors:  Cécile Proust-Lima; Jeremy M G Taylor; Solène Sécher; Howard Sandler; Larry Kestin; Tom Pickles; Kyoungwha Bae; Roger Allison; Scott Williams
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Moderate hypofractionation and simultaneous integrated boost with volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) for prostate cancer. Report of feasibility and acute toxicity.

Authors:  F Alongi; A Fogliata; P Navarria; A Tozzi; P Mancosu; F Lobefalo; G Reggiori; A Clivio; L Cozzi; M Scorsetti
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: treatment approaches and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Raymond Miralbell
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2011

5.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy for organ-confined prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan J Katz; Michael Santoro; Richard Ashley; Ferdinand Diblasio; Matthew Witten
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 6.  Hypofractionated radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Víctor Macías; Albert Biete
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Prognostic factors for acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with high-dose hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  V Macias; R Gonzalez Celador; C Marti-Macia; C Cigarral; L A Perez-Romasanta
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Dosimetric comparison of image guidance by megavoltage computed tomography versus bone alignment for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jörn Kalz; Florian Sterzing; Kai Schubert; Gabriele Sroka-Perez; Jürgen Debus; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Modeling of alpha/beta for late rectal toxicity from a randomized phase II study: conventional versus hypofractionated scheme for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Simona Marzi; Biancamaria Saracino; Maria G Petrongari; Stefano Arcangeli; Sara Gomellini; Giorgio Arcangeli; Marcello Benassi; Valeria Landoni
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-19

10.  Positional reproducibility and effects of a rectal balloon in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jae Ho Cho; Chang-Geol Lee; Dae Ryong Kang; Jooho Kim; Sangkyu Lee; Chang-Ok Suh; Jinsil Seong; Yang Gun Suh; Ikjae Lee; Gwi Eon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.