Literature DB >> 14630258

Ongoing clinical experience utilizing 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy to deliver partial-breast irradiation in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.

Frank A Vicini1, Vincent Remouchamps, Michelle Wallace, Michael Sharpe, Julie Fayad, Laura Tyburski, Nicola Letts, Larry Kestin, Gregory Edmundson, Jane Pettinga, Neal S Goldstein, John Wong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present our ongoing clinical experience utilizing 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) to deliver partial-breast irradiation (PBI) in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients referred for postoperative radiation therapy after lumpectomy were treated with PBI using our previously reported 3D-CRT technique. Ninety-four percent of patients had surgical clips outlining the lumpectomy cavity (mean: 6 clips). The clinical target volume (CTV) consisted of the lumpectomy cavity plus a 10-mm margin in 9 patients and 15-mm margin in 22 (median: 15 mm). The planning target volume consisted of the CTV plus a 10-mm margin for breathing motion and treatment setup uncertainties. The prescribed dose (PD) was 34 or 38.5 Gy (6 patients and 25 patients, respectively) in 10 fractions b.i.d. separated by 6 h and delivered in 5 consecutive days. Patients were treated in the supine position with 3-5 beams (mean: 4) designed to irradiate the CTV with <10% inhomogeneity and a comparable or lower dose to the heart, lung, and contralateral breast compared with standard whole-breast tangents. The median follow-up duration is 10 months (range: 1-30 months). Four patients have been followed >2 years, 6 >1.5 years, and 5 >1 year. The remaining 16 patients have been followed <12 months.
RESULTS: No skin changes greater than Grade 1 erythema were noted during treatment. At the initial 4-8-week follow-up visit, 19 patients (61%) experienced Grade 1 toxicity and 3 patients (10%) Grade 2 toxicity. No Grade 3 toxicities were observed. The remaining 9 patients (29%) had no observable radiation effects. Cosmetic results were rated as good/excellent in all evaluable patients at 6 months (n = 3), 12 months (n = 5), 18 months (n = 6), and in the 4 evaluable patients at >2 years after treatment. The mean coverage of the CTV by the 100% isodose line (IDL) was 98% (range: 54-100%, median: 100%) and by the 95% IDL, 100% (range: 99-100%). The mean coverage of the planning target volume by the 95% IDL was 100% (range: 97-100%). The mean percentage of the breast receiving 100% of the PD was 23% (range: 14-39%). The mean percentage of the breast receiving 50% of the PD was 47% (range: 34-60%).
CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing 3D-CRT to deliver PBI is technically feasible, and acute toxicity to date has been minimal. Additional follow-up will be needed to assess the long-term effects of these larger fraction sizes on normal-tissue sequelae and the impact of this fractionation schedule on treatment efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14630258     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)01573-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  30 in total

Review 1.  Technology as a force for improved diagnosis and treatment of breast disease.

Authors:  Claire M B Holloway; Alexandra Easson; Jaime Escallon; Wey Liang Leong; May Lynn Quan; Michael Reedjik; Frances C Wright; David R McCready
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Early stage breast cancer conserving treatment: high dose rate brachytherapy boost to the tumour bed.

Authors:  María Concepción López Carrizosa; Pilar María Samper Ots; Carmen Vallejo Ocaña; Aurora Rodríguez Pérez; Juan de Dios Sáez Garrido; José María Delgado Pérez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Radiotherapy and wound healing.

Authors:  Emma-Louise Dormand; Paul E Banwell; Timothy E E Goodacre
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Update on accelerated partial-breast irradiation.

Authors:  Alphonse G Taghian; Abram Recht
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Partial breast irradiation techniques in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Agata Kacprowska; Jacek Jassem
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-10-14

6.  Fiducial markers for image-guided partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  Marco Trovo; Jerry Polesel; Cristina Biasutti; Giovanna Sartor; Mario Roncadin; Gaetano Mauro Trovo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  Partial breast irradiation: a review of techniques and indications.

Authors:  A J Stewart; A J Khan; P M Devlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Impact of residual and intrafractional errors on strategy of correction for image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  Gang Cai; Wei-Gang Hu; Jia-Yi Chen; Xiao-Li Yu; Zi-Qiang Pan; Zhao-Zhi Yang; Xiao-Mao Guo; Zhi-Min Shao; Guo-Liang Jiang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  A Phase II trial of brachytherapy alone after lumpectomy for select breast cancer: tumor control and survival outcomes of RTOG 95-17.

Authors:  Douglas W Arthur; Kathryn Winter; Robert R Kuske; John Bolton; Rachel Rabinovitch; Julia White; William F Hanson; Raymond M Wilenzick; Beryl McCormick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Unacceptable cosmesis in a protocol investigating intensity-modulated radiotherapy with active breathing control for accelerated partial-breast irradiation.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Merav A Ben-David; Jean M Moran; Robin B Marsh; Kent A Griffith; James A Hayman; Lori J Pierce
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.