| Literature DB >> 14627440 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of isoflavones (soy phyto-estrogens) on serum total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) and triglyceride (TG).Entities:
Year: 2003 PMID: 14627440 PMCID: PMC293472 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-2-15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Figure 1Trial flow chart of including isoflavones studies. Databases generated 3542 potential eligible randomized controlled trials (RCT). After careful review, seventeen RCT (reference [7-23]) were included in this meta-analysis.
Characteristics of the 17 included studies. There were 9 crossover and 8 parallel studies. The isoflavones tablets introduced were mainly in aglycone form. The abbreviations were listed below table.
| *Calvert 1981 [ | soy biscuits | NA | soy biscuits | 0 | 10 | H | male | 4 |
| Clifton-Bligh 2001(I) [ | T | 57 | T | |||||
| Clifton-Bligh 2001(II) [ | T | 85.5 | 28.5 | 46 | B | female | 26 | |
| Dewell 2002 [ | T | 150 G = 40; D = 50; glycosides = 60 | placebo | 0 | 36 | H | female | 24 |
| Hale 2002 [ | T | 80 G = 40; D = 40 | placebo | 0 | 29 | NS | post | 2 |
| Han 2002 [ | soy protein capsule | 100 G = 70; D = 18; glycitein = 12 | soy protein capsule | 0 | 78 | N | peri | 16 |
| Hodgson 1998 [ | T | 55 G = 30; D = 1; B = 16; F = 8 | placebo | 0 | 59 | N | male & female | 8 |
| Howes 2000 [ | T | 40 G = 1; D = 0.5; B = 26; F = 16 | placebo | 0 | 75 | NS | post | 5 |
| Mackey 2000 [ | ISP | 65 | ISP | < 4 | 49 | H | post | 12 |
| *Merz-Demlow 2000(I) [ | ISP | 113–144 | ISP | |||||
| *Merz-Demlow 2000(II) [ | ISP | 55–74 | 9–11 | 13 | N | female | 3 | |
| *Nestel 1997 [ | T | 40–80 G= 22–43; D = 17–33; glycitein= 1–3 | placebo | 0 | 21 | B | female | 5 |
| *Nestel 1999(I) [ | T | 80 G = 8; D = 7; B = 49; F = 16 | placebo | |||||
| *Nestel 1999(II) [ | T | 40 G = 4; D = 3.5; B = 24.5; F = 8 | 0 | 13 | B | female | 5 | |
| *Samman 1999 [ | T | 86 G = 8.6; D = 7.4; B = 51.4; F = 18.6 | placebo | 0 | 14 | N | pre | 16 |
| *Sanders 2002 [ | soy burger | 56 G = 34.8; D = 21.2 | soy burger | 2 | 22 | N | male & female | 2 |
| *Simons 2000 [ | T | 80 | placebo | 0 | 20 | N | post | 8 |
| Squadrito 2002 [ | T | 54 G= 54 | placebo | 0 | 60 | N | female | 24 |
| *Urban 2001 [ | T | 70 G = 42; D = 27 | ISP | 3 | 28 | N | elderly men | 6 |
| *Wangen 2001(I) [ | ISP | 110–154 | ISP | |||||
| *Wangen 2001(II) [ | ISP | 54–76 | 6–8.2 | 18 | NS | post | 4 |
* crossover design † 'T' = isoflavone tablet; 'ISP' = isolated soy protein ‡ 'G' = Genistein; 'D' = Daidzein; 'B' = Biochanin A; 'F' = Formononectin §'H' = hyperlipidemic subjects, 'N' = normolipidemic subjects; 'B' = both hyper- and normolipidemic subjects; 'NS' = not specified || 'pre' = premenopausal women; 'peri' = perimenopausal women; 'post' = postmenopausal women
Figure 2Funnel plot of risk difference of isoflavones tablets versus placebo on serum total cholesterol. Total treatment size was 274 and total control was 208. The pooled risk difference of isoflavones tablets versus placebo was 0.01 with 95% confidence interval between -0.17 and 0.18. Heterogeneity p-value was 1.00. Note: 'N' = sample size; 'SD' = standard deviation; 'RD' = risk difference; '95% CI' = 95% confidence interval
Subgroup analysis of the effects of isoflavones on serum total cholesterol. Isoflavones were shown to have significant benefits when given in the form of ISP or soy protein capsule. Regardless the forms of prescription, isoflavones decreased serum total cholesterol among normolipidemic but not hyperlipidemic subjects.
| Subgroup outcome | No. of comparisons | No. of subjects || | Treatment effect on TC (mmol/L) ¶ | Heterogeneity p-value § |
| Form of intervention †: | ||||
| a.) isoflavones tablets | 12 [ | 482 | 0.01 (-0.17, 0.18) | 1.00 |
| b.) ISP(+) | 8 [ | 229 | -0.11 (-0.21, -0.01)* | 0.34 |
| c.) soy protein capsule | 1 [ | 78 | -0.69 (-1.19, -0.19)* | NA |
| d.) soy biscuit | 1 [ | 20 | -0.05 (-0.47, 0.37) | NA |
| e.) soy burger | 1 [ | 44 | 0.09 (-0.38, 0.56) | NA |
| f.) Overall | 21 [ | 853 | -0.09 (-0.18, -0.01)* | 0.77 |
| Isoflavones mixture ‡: | ||||
| G&D&B&F | 5 [ | 214 | -0.06 (-0.34, 0.21) | 0.96 |
| G&D | 6 [ | 285 | -0.22 (-0.41, -0.03)* | 0.06 |
| G | 1 [ | 60 | 0.10 (-0.35, 0.55) | NA |
| Isoflavones intake (mg per day): | ||||
| < 50 | 3 [ | 132 | -0.12 (-0.54, 0.29) | 0.99 |
| 51–100 | 12 [ | 484 | -0.10 (-0.21,0.01) | 0.74 |
| 101 – 150 | 4 [ | 176 | -0.10 (-0.24, 0.05) | 0.09 |
| Design : | ||||
| parallel crossover | 9 [ | 447 | -0.08 (-0.27, 0.10) | 0.48 |
| a.) no washout | 1 [ | 56 | -0.43 (-0.73, -0.13)* | NA |
| b.) washout mentioned | 6 [ | 208 | -0.07 (-0.17, 0.03) | 0.91 |
| Gender: | ||||
| male | 2 [ | 76 | -0.30 (-0.54, -0.05)* | 0.15 |
| female | 17 [ | 674 | -0.07 (-0.17, 0.02) | 0.89 |
| Treatment length: | ||||
| 2–10 weeks | 14[ | 541 | -0.09 (-0.18, 0.00) | 0.84 |
| 11–20 weeks | 3 [ | 155 | -0.22 (-0.52, 0.07) | 0.07 |
| 21–30 weeks | 4 [ | 157 | 0.02 (-0.28, 0.31) | 0.96 |
| Menopausal status: | ||||
| pre-menopausal | 3 [ | 80 | -0.06 (-0.17, 0.06) | 0.58 |
| peri-menopausal | 1 [ | 78 | -0.69 (-1.19, -0.19)* | NA |
| post-menopausal | 13 [ | 516 | -0.05 (-0.20, 0.10) | 1.00 |
| Subjects with: | ||||
| normolipidemia | 8 [ | 377 | -0.11 (-0.21, -0.01)* | 0.08 |
| hyperlipidemia | 3 [ | 105 | -0.05 (-0.36, 0.26) | 1.00 |
* statistically significant † 'ISP (+)' = isoflavone containing isolated soy protein; 'ISP (-)' = isoflavone depleting isolated soy protein ‡ 'G' = Genistein; 'D' = Daidzein; 'B' = Biochanin A; 'F' = Formononectin § NA = not applicable || Since subjects acted as their own controls in a crossover trial, the 'calculated' total number was thus doubled in a single pair comparison. ¶ 95% confidence interval in parenthesis
Effects of isoflavones on serum LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides levels. Isoflavones in the forms of tablets or isolated soy protein (ISP) did not show significant benefits over serum LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides levels. The results were not heterogeneous to combine.
| 1.) Isoflavones tablets | |||||
| LDL | 9 | 11[ | 446 | 0.00 (-0.14, 0.15) | 0.94 |
| HDL | 10 | 12[ | 482 | 0.01 (-0.05, 0.06) | 0.98 |
| TG | 9 | 12[ | 482 | 0.03 (-0.06, 0.12) | 0.93 |
| 2.) ISP (+) | |||||
| LDL | 3 | 5 [ | 173 | -0.06 (-0.16, 0.03) | 0.84 |
| HDL | 3 | 5 [ | 173 | -0.01 (-0.07, 0.05) | 0.97 |
| TG | 3 | 5 [ | 173 | 0.02 (-0.05, 0.09) | 1.00 |
* 'ISP (+)' = isoflavones containing isolated soy protein; 'LDL' = Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; 'HDL' = High density lipoprotein cholesterol; 'TG' = Triglycerides † 95% confidence interval in parenthesis