Literature DB >> 14627355

Nutritional status and quality of life in patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in practice: prospective one-year follow-up.

Joachim Klose1, Walter Heldwein, Michael Rafferzeder, Frederike Sernetz, Manfred Gross, Klaus Loeschke.   

Abstract

Sixty patients (age 73 +/- 14 years; 22 women, 38 men) with dysphagia (67% neurological diseases, 33% tumors) were followed up for 1 year after placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Before PEG placement and at six appointments thereafter, the patients' nutritional status was measured using bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) and hematological nutritional parameters. A validated questionnaire was used to assess quality of life (the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, GIQLI). The overall mortality rate was 65%, and mortality during the hospitalization period was 22%. Depending on the duration of the dysphagia, marked nutritional deficits were observed at the start of the study (deficiencies in albumin in 49% of the patients, calcium in 15%, magnesium in 18%, retinol in 78%, alpha-tocopherol in 16%, folic acid in 16%, vitamin B12 in 8%, vitamin D in 40%, and zinc in 46%). With the exception of vitamin E, all parameters returned to normal during the follow-up period. At the start of the study, BIA indicated nutritional deficiency in 90% of the patients, with no overall improvement being observed during the follow-up period. The GIQLI scores, on average, reached a figure of 61% of an unrestricted quality of life. In conclusion, long-term nutrition via the PEG tube maintained the patients' quality of life. For BIA most patients were malnourished during the follow-up period, but nevertheless PEG feeding was enough to compensate for gross nutritional deficiencies. Not infrequently, the indication for PEG placement is established too late.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14627355     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026199110891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  33 in total

Review 1.  American Gastroenterological Association technical review on tube feeding for enteral nutrition.

Authors:  D F Kirby; M H Delegge; C R Fleming
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  G D Schapiro; S A Edmundowicz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1996-04

3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a prospective analysis of hospital support required and complications following discharge to the community.

Authors:  D S Sanders; M J Carter; J D'Silva; M E McAlindon; P J Willemse; K D Bardham
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  Bioelectrical impedance and body composition: present status and future directions.

Authors:  W C Chumlea; S S Guo
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.110

5.  Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  C Löser; S Wolters; U R Fölsch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Prophylactic gastrostomy tubes in patients undergoing intensive irradiation for cancer of the head and neck.

Authors:  J H Lee; M Machtay; L D Unger; G S Weinstein; R S Weber; A A Chalian; D I Rosenthal
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-08

7.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized prospective comparison of early and delayed feeding.

Authors:  U Choudhry; C J Barde; R Markert; N Gopalswamy
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Long-term enteral feeding: a retrospective comparison of delivery via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasoenteric tubes.

Authors:  D E Fay; M Poplausky; M Gruber; P Lance
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in AIDS and control patients: risks and outcome.

Authors:  J Ockenga; U Süttmann; O Selberg; A Schlesinger; P N Meier; M Gebel; I Schedel; H Deicher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Body composition of patients with malnutrition and cancer. Summary of methods of assessment.

Authors:  H M Shizgal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  6 in total

1.  Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  M Ljungdahl; M Sundbom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The development and validation of a quality-of-life questionnaire for head and neck cancer patients with enteral feeding tubes: the QOL-EF.

Authors:  Christiaan Seimeon Michael Stevens; Betty Lemon; Gina A Lockwood; John N Waldron; Andrea Bezjak; Jolie Ringash
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  A pilot study exploring the factors that influence the decision to have PEG feeding in patients with progressive conditions.

Authors:  Siobhan Vesey; Paula Leslie; Catherine Exley
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 4.  Nutritional Assessment in Adult Patients with Dysphagia: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Junko Ueshima; Ryo Momosaki; Akio Shimizu; Keiko Motokawa; Mika Sonoi; Yuka Shirai; Chiharu Uno; Yoji Kokura; Midori Shimizu; Ai Nishiyama; Daisuke Moriyama; Kaori Yamamoto; Kotomi Sakai
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Factors predicting major complications, mortality, and recovery in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Kenji J L Limpias Kamiya; Naoki Hosoe; Kaoru Takabayashi; Yukie Hayashi; Seiichiro Fukuhara; Makoto Mutaguchi; Rieko Nakamura; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Yuko Kitagawa; Haruhiko Ogata; Takanori Kanai
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2021-03-31

6.  The complication rate, but not the mortality rate, lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after open surgical gastrostomy: comparison of two methods in a high volume group of patients.

Authors:  Gustaw Lech; Waldemar Pawłowski; Wojciech Korcz; Tomasz Guzel; Bohdan Dąbrowski; Andrzej Opuchlik; Dominika Głąbska; Maciej Słodkowski
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 1.627

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.