Literature DB >> 14627258

What predicts serious complications in colorectal cancer resection?

David Zingmond1, Melinda Maggard, Jessica O'Connell, Jerome Liu, David Etzioni, Clifford Ko.   

Abstract

Virtually all volume-outcome studies use mortality as their outcome measure, yet most general surgical procedures have low in-patient death rates. We examined whether hospital surgical volume impacts other colorectal cancer resection outcomes and complications. Colorectal cancer (CRC) resections from 1996 to 2000 were identified using the California hospital discharge database. Comorbidity was graded using a modified Charlson index. Hospital CRC resection volume was calculated. Serious medical complications were defined as life-threatening cardiac or respiratory events, renal failure, or shock. Serious surgical complications were defined as vascular events, need for reoperation, or bleeding. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the impact of predictors on complications. We identified 56,621 resections. Median age was 70 to 74 years. Eighty-one per cent of patients were white. Most had localized (57%) versus distant (22%) disease. Serious medical (17.5%) and surgical (9.8%) complications were not infrequent. In multivariate analyses, greater annual CRC surgical volume predicted lower odds of serious complication, but patient characteristics (age, comorbidity, and acuity of surgery) were more important. Although patients receiving CRC resection at lower-volume hospitals have greater odds of complication than patients treated at higher-volume institutions, patient factors remain the most important determinants of complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14627258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  14 in total

Review 1.  Shaping the future of surgery: the role of private regulation in determining quality standards.

Authors:  Rachael A Callcut; Tara M Breslin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ya Ruth Huo; Kevin Phan; David L Morris; Winston Liauw
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

3.  Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Chao Li; Francesco Carli; Lawrence Lee; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; Alexander S Liberman; Pepa Kaneva; Berson Augustin; Mingkwan Wongyingsinn; Ann Gamsa; Do Jun Kim; Melina C Vassiliou; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Reoperation as a quality indicator in colorectal surgery: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Arden M Morris; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Barbara Matthews; Jason A Dominitz; William E Barlow; Sharon A Dobie; Kevin G Billingsley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer.

Authors:  E Kuhry; H J Bonjer; E Haglind; W C J Hop; R Veldkamp; M A Cuesta; J Jeekel; L Påhlman; M Morino; A Lacy; S Delgado
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: how can we improve outcome?

Authors:  Henning Mothes; Astrid Bauschke; Silke Schuele; Ekkehard Eigendorff; Annelore Altendorf-Hofmann; Utz Settmacher
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence in colon cancer surgery--a population-based registry study.

Authors:  Bodil Gessler; David Bock; Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Jakob Burcharth; Jacob Rosenberg; Eva Angenete
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  The significance of underlying cardiac comorbidity on major adverse cardiac events after major liver resection.

Authors:  Thuy B Tran; David J Worhunsky; David A Spain; Monica M Dua; Brendan C Visser; Jeffrey A Norton; George A Poultsides
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Decreased core muscle size is associated with worse patient survival following esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  K H Sheetz; L Zhao; S A Holcombe; S C Wang; R M Reddy; J Lin; M B Orringer; A C Chang
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.429

10.  Complications with laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy: multivariate analysis of 300 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jong-Min Park; Sung-Ho Jin; Sang-Rim Lee; Hong Kim; In Ho Jung; Yong Kwan Cho; Sang-Uk Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.