Literature DB >> 14625768

Gender- and sequence-dependent predation within group colonizers of defended plants: a constraint on cheating among bark beetles?

Brian H Aukema1, Kenneth F Raffa.   

Abstract

Bark beetles engage in one of the most pronounced examples of group procurement of defended plants. Their aggregation pheromones attract both sexes and are essential to overcome constitutive and rapidly inducible lethal defenses. The relative benefits to senders versus receivers of these signals are only partly understood. Because the initial stage of host entry can be hazardous, there may be benefit to a cheating strategy, whose practitioners respond to pheromones but do not engage in host searching. Several disadvantages to cheating have been proposed, but the role of predators has not been considered. Predators exploit bark beetle pheromones to locate prey, accumulate at the breeding site, and consume adult bark beetles before they enter the tree. Preliminary experiments quantified arrival patterns in the field. We used a laboratory assay to investigate relative predation on pioneers (those that initially select and enter hosts) and responders (those that arrive at a host in response to pheromones) during host colonization. Our model system utilized the pine engraver, Ips pini, which exhibits male harem polygamy. We allowed male I. pini to colonize host tissue and added females 1 day later. Also 1 day later, we variably added additional males and predacious checkered beetles, Thanasimus dubius. These treatments included two densities of males and three densities of predators that were selected to emulate field conditions. Responding males experienced higher predation than pioneers. T. dubius ate more males than females, independent of the presence or absence of responding males. T. dubius affected the distribution of females per male, although the number of females that survived to construct ovipositional galleries was constant. We discuss the viability of cheating, implications for biological control, and predator-prey coevolution in this cooperative, group-colonizing herbivore.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14625768     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1433-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

1.  Solving the freeloaders paradox: Genetic associations and frequency-dependent selection in the evolution of cooperation among nonrelatives.

Authors:  Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Individual variation in aggregation pheromone content of the bark beetle,Ips typographus.

Authors:  G Birgersson; F Schlyter; G Bergström; J Löfqvist
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Combined chemical defenses against an insect-fungal complex.

Authors:  K D Klepzig; E B Smalley; K F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Contributions of female oviposition patterns and larval behavior to group defense in conifer sawflies (hymenoptera: diprionidae).

Authors:  Sylvio G Codella; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Predation enhances complexity in the evolution of electric fish signals.

Authors:  P K Stoddard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Variation in semiochemical-mediated prey-predator interaction:Ips pini (Scolytidae) andThanasimus dubius (Cleridae).

Authors:  D A Herms; R A Haack; B D Ayres
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Relative effects of exophytic predation, endophytic predation, and intraspecific competition on a subcortical herbivore: consequences to the reproduction of Ips pini and Thanasimus dubius.

Authors:  Brian H Aukema; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Modulation of predator attraction to pheromones of two prey species by stereochemistry of plant volatiles.

Authors:  Nadir Erbilgin; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Predation and bark beetle dynamics.

Authors:  John D Reeve
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Enantiomeric composition of ipsdienol: A chemotaxonomic character for north American populations ofIps spp. in thepini subgeneric group (coleoptera: Scolytidae).

Authors:  S J Seybold; T Ohtsuka; D L Wood; I Kubo
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  6 in total

1.  High individual variation in pheromone production by tree-killing bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae).

Authors:  Deepa S Pureswaran; Brian T Sullivan; Matthew P Ayres
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-07-28

Review 2.  Terpenes tell different tales at different scales: glimpses into the Chemical Ecology of conifer - bark beetle - microbial interactions.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Fitness consequences of pheromone production and host selection strategies in a tree-killing bark beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae).

Authors:  Deepa S Pureswaran; Brian T Sullivan; Matthew P Ayres
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Trees wanted--dead or alive! Host selection and population dynamics in tree-killing bark beetles.

Authors:  Kyrre L Kausrud; Jean-Claude Grégoire; Olav Skarpaas; Nadir Erbilgin; Marius Gilbert; Bjørn Økland; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Dispersal variability and associated population-level consequences in tree-killing bark beetles.

Authors:  Markus Kautz; Muhammad Ali Imron; Kai Dworschak; Reinhard Schopf
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.600

6.  Environment and Local Substrate Availability Effects on Harem Formation in a Polygynous Bark Beetle.

Authors:  Melissa J Griffin; Matthew R E Symonds
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 2.769

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.