Literature DB >> 28547115

Modulation of predator attraction to pheromones of two prey species by stereochemistry of plant volatiles.

Nadir Erbilgin1, Kenneth F Raffa1.   

Abstract

Predators and parasitoids are known to exploit both plant volatiles and herbivore pheromones to locate their insect prey. However, the interaction of these chemical cues in prey location, and the implications of multiple sources of chemical cues to predator feeding breadth and tracking of herbivore counter adaptations, are less well understood. We evaluated the responses of three coleopteran predators to the pheromones and plant signals associated with two species of common bark beetle prey. Thanasimus dubius, Platysoma cylindrica, and Corticeus parallelus feed exclusively on the fauna within trees colonized by bark beetles. The predominant bark beetles in conifer forests of central Wisconsin are Ips pini and Ips grandicollis. The aggregation pheromone of Wisconsin I. pini contains ipsdienol, which occurs as (+) and (-) enantiomers, and lanierone, and the pheromone of I. grandicollis contains ipsenol. The major hosts of these bark beetles are Pinus resinosa, Pinus banksiana, and Pinus strobus, which contain monoterpenes as their predominant phytochemical volatiles. Monoterpenes by themselves did not attract predators. However, some monoterpenes significantly affected predator attraction to aggregation pheromones. Myrcene, and to a lesser extent 3-carene, reduced predator attraction. By contrast, α-pinene consistently enhanced attraction by all three predators to the pheromones of their Ips prey. However, the predators' responses were modulated by the stereochemistry of α-pinene, and these responses differed when confronted with the different pheromones of the two prey species. (+)-α-Pinene synergized predator responses to the pheromone of I. pini, whereas (-)-α-pinene synergized responses to the pheromone of I. grandicollis. This pattern occurred for all three predator species. Interactions between herbivore pheromones and host plant compounds may provide an important source of behavioral plasticity in predators, and facilitate their ability to track several cryptic species that are distributed across multiple plant species and that show semiochemical variation in space and time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enemy free space; Phenotypic plasticity; Pheromones; Predation; Scolytidae

Year:  2001        PMID: 28547115     DOI: 10.1007/s004420000606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Stereochemistry of host plant monoterpenes as mate location cues for the gall wasp Antistrophus rufus.

Authors:  John F Tooker; Lawrence M Hanks
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Application of semiochemicals to assess the biodiversity of subcortical insects following an ecosystem disturbance in a sub-boreal forest.

Authors:  Kamal J K Gandhi; Daniel W Gilmore; Robert A Haack; Steven A Katovich; Steven J Krauth; William J Mattson; John C Zasada; Steven J Seybold
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Can chemical communication be cryptic? Adaptations by herbivores to natural enemies exploiting prey semiochemistry.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa; Kenneth R Hobson; Sara Lafontaine; Brian H Aukema
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Phloeophagous and predaceous insects responding to synthetic pheromones of bark beetles inhabiting white spruce stands in the Great Lakes region.

Authors:  Kirsten E Haberkern; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Gender- and sequence-dependent predation within group colonizers of defended plants: a constraint on cheating among bark beetles?

Authors:  Brian H Aukema; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Aromatized to find mates: α-pinene aroma boosts the mating success of adult olive fruit flies.

Authors:  Christos D Gerofotis; Charalampos S Ioannou; Nikos T Papadopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.