Literature DB >> 14620364

Human nonverbal counting estimated by response production and verbal report.

Michael J Boisvert1, Benjamin D Abroms, William A Roberts.   

Abstract

In three experiments, people were shown sequential displays and were prevented from verbal counting by being required to perform other cognitive tasks. In Experiment 1, the subjects were shown three target (target = 8, 16, or 32) sequences of colored geometric shapes. On occasional question trials, the subjects were asked to estimate the target number after the final item in the sequence. On other test trials, items continued to appear beyond the target, and the subjects estimated the target manually by tapping a space bar. In Experiments 2 and 3, a matching-to-sample procedure required the subjects to estimate the same sequence of items (target = 8, 11, 14, 17, or 20) both verbally and manually. The results indicated that (1) manual and verbal estimates closely approximated target size in Experiments 1 and 2, (2) coefficients of variation were constant across target size, and (3) correlations between manual and verbal estimates were positive in Experiments 2 and 3. Requiring the subjects to perform a counting task during presentation of items led to underestimation of number in Experiment 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620364     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Pigeons flexibly time or count on cue.

Authors:  W A Roberts; R Coughlin; S Roberts
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-05

2.  Preschoolers' magnitude comparisons are mediated by a preverbal analog mechanism.

Authors:  G Huntley-Fenner; E Cannon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-03

3.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers.

Authors:  S Cordes; R Gelman; C R Gallistel; J Whalen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

Review 4.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; R Gelman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-08

5.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants.

Authors:  F Xu; E S Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-01-10

6.  Numerical abstraction by human infants.

Authors:  P Starkey; E S Spelke; R Gelman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1990-08

7.  Children's understanding of number is similar to adults' and rats': numerical estimation by 5--7-year-olds.

Authors:  G Huntley-Fenner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-03

8.  Perception of numbers by human infants.

Authors:  P Starkey; R G Cooper
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Infant perception of numerosity.

Authors:  M S Strauss; L E Curtis
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1981

10.  Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing.

Authors:  S Dehaene; R Akhavein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  3 in total

1.  Temporal information affects the performance of numerosity discrimination: behavioral evidence for a shared system for numerosity and temporal processing.

Authors:  Midori Tokita; Akira Ishiguchi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

2.  Human nonverbal discrimination of relative and absolute number.

Authors:  Lavinia Tan; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) treat small and large numbers of items similarly during a relative quantity judgment task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.