Literature DB >> 14620360

Semantic context effects and priming in word association.

René Zeelenberg1, Diane Pecher, Richard M Shiffrin, Jeroen G W Raaijmakers.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated priming in word association, an implicit memory task. In the study phase of Experiment 1, semantically ambiguous target words were presented in sentences that biased their interpretation. The appropriate interpretation of the target was either congruent or incongruent with the cue presented in a subsequent word association task. Priming (i.e., a higher proportion of target responses relative to a nonstudied baseline) was obtained for the congruent condition, but not for the incongruent condition. In Experiment 2, study sentences emphasized particular meaning aspects of nonambiguous targets. The word association task showed a higher proportion of target responses for targets studied in the more congruent sentence context than for targets studied in the less congruent sentence context. These results indicate that priming in word association depends largely on the storage of information relating the cue and target.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620360     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Priming in a free association task as a function of association directionality.

Authors:  R Zeelenberg; R M Shiffrin; J G Raaijmakers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  Probing memory with conceptual cues at multiple retention intervals: a comparison of forgetting rates on implicit and explicit tests.

Authors:  Y Goshen-Gottstein; H Kempinsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

3.  The origins of levels-of-processing effects in a conceptual test: evidence for automatic influences of memory from the process-dissociation procedure.

Authors:  Dafna Bergerbest; Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

4.  How semantic is automatic semantic priming?

Authors:  J R Shelton; R C Martin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering.

Authors:  H L Roediger
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1990-09

6.  Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming.

Authors:  G McKoon; R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-12

7.  Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests.

Authors:  C J Vaidya; J D Gabrieli; M M Keane; L A Monti; H Gutiérrez-Rivas; M M Zarella
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Recollective and automatic uses of memory.

Authors:  D L Nelson; D J Bennett; J Xu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; A D Well
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Semantic specificity in cued recall.

Authors:  H L Roediger; B Adelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-01
View more
  10 in total

1.  The origins of levels-of-processing effects in a conceptual test: evidence for automatic influences of memory from the process-dissociation procedure.

Authors:  Dafna Bergerbest; Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

2.  Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: modality-specific effects of prior activation.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

3.  Neural specialization of phonological and semantic processing in young children.

Authors:  Yael Weiss; Hannah G Cweigenberg; James R Booth
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities.

Authors:  Rebecca A Gilbert; Matthew H Davis; M Gareth Gaskell; Jennifer M Rodd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Working memory capacity moderates the predictive effects of drug-related associations on substance use.

Authors:  Jerry L Grenard; Susan L Ames; Reinout W Wiers; Carolien Thush; Steve Sussman; Alan W Stacy
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2008-09

6.  A sharp image or a sharp knife: norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items.

Authors:  Saskia van Dantzig; Rosemary A Cowell; René Zeelenberg; Diane Pecher
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-03

7.  Sentence Context and Word-Picture Cued-Recall Paired-Associate Learning Procedure Boosts Recall in Normal and Mild Alzheimer's Disease Patients.

Authors:  Rosario Iodice; Juan José García Meilán; Juan Carro Ramos; Jeff A Small
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.342

8.  A framework for the extended monitoring of levels of cognitive function in unresponsive patients.

Authors:  Richard L Mah; John F Connolly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Influence of Poststudy Action Congruency on Memory Consolidation.

Authors:  René Zeelenberg; Sebastiaan Remmers; Florence Blaauwgeers; Diane Pecher
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2020-07

10.  Number-induced shifts in spatial attention: a replication study.

Authors:  Kiki Zanolie; Diane Pecher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.